Constructed Wetlands as a Sustainable Solution for Wastewater Treatment in Small Villages

Abstract With the aim of solving the wastewater treatment problem in small villages, treatment performance of a pilot-scale subsurface-flow constructed wetland (SFW) was evaluated for removal efficiency of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), total and faecal coliform and faecal streptococci bacteria from raw municipal wastewater. Studies of the composition and thermal behaviour of the harvested biomass were achieved in order to assess their possible utilisation as a fuel. Two different hydraulic application rates (150, and 75 mm day −1 ) and two macrophytes, cattail ( Typha sp.) and reed ( Phragmites sp.), were assayed. High levels of BOD, COD and TSS removal for all treatments were obtained. The best removals were obtained in those beds with the lowest hydraulic application rate. With regard to the type of plant, no significant differences were found between cattail and reed performance; however, cattails showed to be by far (almost a factor of 2) the greatest producer of biomass (22 t [d.m.] ha −1 ). Both cattails and reeds presented high heating values (17–20 MJ kg −1 ). According to these results, it can be concluded that the wetland system utilised in this research could be a suitable solution for raw wastewater as a stand-alone treatment, although a previous pre-treatment in order to remove grit, heavy solids and floatable materials would be necessary. Besides, the obtained biomass could be utilised as fuel in a small boiler for domestic uses.

[1]  A. Ennabili,et al.  Biomass production and NPK retention in macrophytes from wetlands of the Tingitan Peninsula. , 1998 .

[2]  R. J. Haynes,et al.  AMMONIUM AND NITRATE NUTRITION OF PLANTS , 1978 .

[3]  N. Ouazzani,et al.  Application of constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment in an arid climate , 1998 .

[4]  A. Ghaly,et al.  Study of agglomeration characteristics of silica sand-straw ash mixtures using scanning electronic microscopy and energy dispersion X-ray techniques , 1994 .

[5]  J. T. O'connor,et al.  Winter and spring evaluations of a wetland for tertiary wastewater treatment , 1997 .

[6]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[7]  Michal Green,et al.  Constructed wetlands for river reclamation: Experimental design, start-up and preliminary results , 1996 .

[8]  Hans Brix,et al.  Treatment of Wastewater in the Rhizosphere of Wetland Plants – The Root-Zone Method , 1987 .

[9]  Oliver Lindqvist,et al.  High-temperature reactions of straw ash and the anti-sintering additives kaolin and dolomite , 1998 .

[10]  U. Jäglid,et al.  The effects of fuel washing techniques on alkali release from biomass , 2002 .

[11]  Chris C. Tanner,et al.  Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems — A comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species , 1996 .

[12]  N. Singh,et al.  Horizontal Subsurface Flow Gravel Bed Constructed Wetland with Phragmites Karka in Central India , 1999 .

[13]  D. T. Hill,et al.  INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE ON TREATMENT EFFICIENCY OF CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS , 1998 .

[14]  Charles R. Goldman,et al.  Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands. , 1986 .

[15]  K. Reddy,et al.  Vegetated Submerged Beds with Artificial Substrates. II: N and P Removal , 1991 .

[16]  D. T. Hill,et al.  Ammonia effects on the biomass production of five constructed wetland plant species , 1997 .