Extrauterine translocated contraceptive device: a presentation of five cases and revisit of the enigmatic issues of iatrogenic perforation and migration.

Translocation of an intrauterine contraceptive device to an extrauterine site in the peritoneal cavity is an uncommon complication. In cases reported in literature, the timing of extrauterine presentation and the distant sites of translocation often raise the issue of whether iatrogenic uterine perforation or migration of the device was responsible. We present and discuss five referred cases of the extrauterine device inserted in centres outside the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. The indication for insertion of the intrauterine contraceptive device in the patients (mean age 25.6 years) was contraception in four patients and adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome in the fifth. The most common presenting symptom was inability to feel the device's string (in three patients). Four of the patients presented within one month of the insertion. Three of the five translocated intraperitoneal devices were recovered by laparotomy and the forth by laparoscopy. The fifth patient, pregnant, defaulted with the device still retained. We are of the opinion that primary iatrogenic uterine perforation occurs occasionally. Other possible translocatory mechanisms include spontaneous uterine contractions, urinary bladder contractions, gut peristalsis and movement of peritoneal fluid.

[1]  P. Sarkar,et al.  Translocation of a Copper 7 intra-uterine contraceptive device with subsequent penetration of the caecum: Case report and review , 2000, British Journal of Family Planning.

[2]  P. Fall,et al.  [Migration of an intrauterine device to the bladder]. , 2000, Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie.

[3]  P. Audra,et al.  [The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature]. , 1999, Contraception, fertilite, sexualite.

[4]  M. Pawlaczyk,et al.  [A case of IUD translocation to the peritoneal cavity--diagnostic procedures and treatment]. , 1997, Ginekologia polska.

[5]  B. Caspi,et al.  Penetration of the bladder by a perforating intrauterine contraceptive device: a sonographic diagnosis , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  A. Bongain,et al.  [Iliac vein stenosis caused by intrauterine device migration]. , 1995, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[7]  P. Pellizzari,et al.  A rare case of IUD tubal migration. Case report. , 1994, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[8]  J. GrimaldoArriaga,et al.  Perforation of the large intestine caused by a type 7 medicated copper IUD , 1993 .

[9]  K. Søgaard,et al.  Unrecognized perforation of the uterine and rectal walls by an intrauterine contraceptive device , 1993, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[10]  J. Kabalin,et al.  Intravesical migration of intrauterine device. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Rahaman,et al.  Missing intrauterine contraceptive device presenting with strings at the anus. , 1991, The West Indian medical journal.

[12]  N. Goldstuck,et al.  IUD insertion forces: effects of recent childbirth and lactation , 1988, Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception.

[13]  N. Goldstuck Insertion forces with intrauterine devices: implications for uterine perforation. , 1987, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[14]  A. Treisser,et al.  [Causes, diagnosis and treatment of uterine perforations by intrauterine devices]. , 1978, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[15]  Hon Eh,et al.  Quantitation of uterine activity. , 1973 .

[16]  E. Friedman EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON UTERINE CONTRACTILITY. , 1965, Anesthesiology.