Characteristic Low Density and Shear Sensitivity of Cross-Linked Chromatin Containing Polycomb Complexes

ABSTRACT Chromatin cross-linking is widely used for mapping the distribution of chromosomal proteins by immunoprecipitation, but our knowledge of the physical properties of chromatin complexes remains rudimentary. Density gradients have been long used to separate fragments of cross-linked chromatin with their bound proteins from free protein or free DNA. We find that the association of DNA fragments with very-high-molecular-weight protein complexes shifts their buoyant density to values much lower then that of bulk chromatin. We show that in a CsCl gradient, Polycomb response elements, promoters of active genes, and insulator or boundary elements are found at buoyant densities similar to those of free protein and are depleted from the bulk chromatin fractions. In these regions, the low density is associated with the presence of large protein complexes and with high sensitivity to sonication. Our results suggest that separation of different chromatin regions according to their buoyant density may bias chromatin immunoprecipitation results. Density centrifugation of cross-linked chromatin may provide a simple approach to investigate the properties of large chromatin complexes in vivo.

[1]  A. Rougvie,et al.  Postinitiation transcriptional control in Drosophila melanogaster , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[2]  R. Chalkley,et al.  The separation of transcriptionally engaged genes. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  F. Karch,et al.  The iab-7 Polycomb Response Element Maps to a Nucleosome-Free Region of Chromatin and Requires Both GAGA and Pleiohomeotic for Silencing Activity , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  P. Lohman,et al.  Repair of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in the individual genes Gart, Notch and white from Drosophila melanogaster cell lines. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Gerald D Fasman Handbook of Biochemistry , 1976 .

[6]  V. Pirrotta,et al.  Extensive conservation of sequences and chromatin structures in the bxd polycomb response element among Drosophilid species. , 2002, International Journal of Developmental Biology.

[7]  J. Simon,et al.  A Drosophila ESC-E(Z) Protein Complex Is Distinct from Other Polycomb Group Complexes and Contains Covalently Modified ESC , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  M. Sporn,et al.  Studies on chromatin. II. Effects of carcinogens and hormones on rat liver chromatin. , 1966, Cancer research.

[9]  R. Paro,et al.  Mapping DNA target sites of chromatin-associated proteins by formaldehyde cross-linking in Drosophila embryos , 2000 .

[10]  A. Udvardy,et al.  The 87A7 chromomere. Identification of novel chromatin structures flanking the heat shock locus that may define the boundaries of higher order domains. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[12]  C. Allis,et al.  In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic Protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment. , 1999, Methods.

[13]  Y. Ilyin,et al.  Heterogeneity of deoxynucleoprotein particles as evidencec by ultracentrifugation of cesium chloride density gradient. , 1969, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  S. Elgin,et al.  Protein/DNA architecture of the DNase I hypersensitive region of the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[15]  Y. Ilyin,et al.  Studies on chromatin. Free DNA in sheared chromatin. , 1976, European journal of biochemistry.

[16]  E. Lewis,et al.  Complete sequence of the bithorax complex of Drosophila. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  A. Birve,et al.  A 1-Megadalton ESC/E(Z) Complex from Drosophila That Contains Polycomblike and RPD3 , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  Mapping proteinDNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: Evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene , 1988, Cell.

[19]  K. Zhao,et al.  Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary element-associated factor BEAF-32 , 1995, Cell.

[20]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[21]  S. Poux,et al.  Structure of a Polycomb Response Element and In Vitro Binding of Polycomb Group Complexes Containing GAGA Factor , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[22]  W. Bickmore Chromosome Structural Analysis - A Practical Approach , 1999 .

[23]  C. Allis,et al.  A simplified formaldehyde fixation and immunoprecipitation technique for studying protein-DNA interactions. , 1991, Analytical biochemistry.

[24]  S. Poux,et al.  Recruitment of components of Polycomb Group chromatin complexes in Drosophila. , 2001, Development.

[25]  R. Kingston,et al.  Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex , 1999, Cell.

[26]  V. Orlando,et al.  General transcription factors bind promoters repressed by Polycomb group proteins , 2001, Nature.

[27]  D. Brutlag,et al.  Properties of formaldehyde-treated nucleohistone. , 1969, Biochemistry.

[28]  R. Paro,et al.  Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking. , 1997, Methods.

[29]  V. Orlando,et al.  Mapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitation. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[30]  P. Schedl,et al.  The Zw5 protein, a component of the scs chromatin domain boundary, is able to block enhancer-promoter interaction. , 1999, Genes & development.