Do (how) digital natives adopt a new technology differently than digital immigrants? A longitudinal study

Abstract Although the information systems (IS) literature has revealed a variety of mechanisms involved in technology adoption and postadoption use, the literature lacks insights about how individuals with different usage characteristics process the information related to new IS and how their belief judgments and use behavior unfold over time. This study fills this void in the literature by conceptualizing and testing a comprehensive model to investigate the impact of user orientation toward technology use by digital natives (DNs) and digital immigrants (DIs) on technology continuous use behavior. The effect of DNs and DIs is currently gaining the attention of researchers. This study investigated the postadoption and use behavior of these groups using a three-wave panel model and with decomposed theory of planned behavior (DTPB) as the initial adoption model. The longitudinal model is a unified framework that sheds light on four different mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena: (1) the belief judgment evaluation processes suggested by the DTPB model, (2) sequential updating mechanism, (3) feedback mechanism, and (4) habit mechanism. Based on multigroup analysis, we show that a clear pattern of differences in effect exists between DNs and DIs with respect to the sequential belief updating mechanism and that these results are relatively stable over time.

[1]  R. Eynon,et al.  Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[3]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[4]  I. Ajzen.  Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives , 2002 .

[5]  Tomasz Drabowicz,et al.  Social theory of internet use: Corroboration or rejection among the digital natives? Correspondence analysis of adolescents in two societies , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[7]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction , 1994 .

[8]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Addressing Common Method Variance: Guidelines for Survey Research on Information Technology, Operations, and Supply Chain Management , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Akhilesh Bajaj,et al.  A feedback model to understand information system usage , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Johan Lindell.  A Methodological Intervention in Cosmopolitanism Research: Cosmopolitan Dispositions Amongst Digital Natives , 2014 .

[12]  N. Melone.  A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[13]  Timothy Teo,et al.  An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS) , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[14]  John P. Charlton,et al.  Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[16]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[17]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[19]  K. Berridge,et al.  Incentive-sensitization and addiction. , 2001, Addiction.

[20]  O. Popova.  Germany and the EU policy of international development assistance , 2016 .

[21]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[22]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[23]  Edward A. Witt,et al.  Trends in youth's videogame playing, overall computer use, and communication technology use: The impact of self-esteem and the Big Five personality factors , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Monereo i Font Carles.  The virtual construction of the mind: the role of educational psychology , 2004 .

[25]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Do digital natives differ by computer self-efficacy and experience? An empirical study , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[26]  Mark Western,et al.  Beneath the ‘Digital Native’ myth , 2013 .

[27]  Denise E. Agosto.  Design vs. Content: A Study of Adolescent Girls' Website Design Preferences , 2004 .

[28]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World , 2008 .

[29]  David Sundaram,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 5-2-2012 DIGITAL NATIVES AND DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS : TOWARDS A MODEL OF DIGITAL FLUENCY , 2013 .

[30]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[31]  R. Bagozzi.  Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. , 1981 .

[32]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[33]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: An Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users , 2011, MIS Q..

[35]  David Mazursky,et al.  A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process , 1983 .

[36]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[37]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[38]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Addressing Digital Inequality for the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Through Government Initiatives: Forms of Capital That Affect ICT Utilization , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[40]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. , 1998 .

[41]  Steve Howard,et al.  Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[42]  N. Howe,et al.  Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation , 2000 .

[43]  P. Bentler,et al.  Attitudes "cause" behaviors: A structural equation analysis. , 1981 .

[44]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[46]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[47]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[48]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[49]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[50]  W. Reynolds.  Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale , 1982 .

[51]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[52]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[53]  Penny Thompson,et al.  The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[54]  Leif R. Hedman,et al.  Using information technology: engagement modes, flow experience, and personality orientations , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[56]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[57]  Sung S. Kim.  The integrative framework of technology use: an extension and test , 2009 .

[58]  L. Fortunati,et al.  Digital generations, but not as we know them , 2019 .

[59]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[60]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[61]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  John P. Charlton,et al.  The Development and Validation of the Computer Apathy and Anxiety Scale , 1995 .

[63]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[64]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices , 1997 .

[65]  Diana G. Oblinger.  Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.". , 2003 .

[66]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .