Joint PHY-MAC Design for Opportunistic Spectrum Access in the Presence of Sensing Errors

We address the design of opportunistic spectrum access (OSA ) strategies that allow secondary users to independently search for and exploit instantaneous spec trum availability. The design objective is to maximize the throughput of secondary users while limiting t he probability of colliding with primary users. Integrated in the joint design are three basic compon ents: a spectrum sensor at the physical (PHY) layer that identifies spectrum opportunities, a sensing str ategy at the medium access control (MAC) layer that determines which channels in the spectrum to sense, and an access strategy, also at the MAC layer, that decides whether to access based on sensing outcomes tha t are subject to errors. We formulate the joint PHY-MAC design of OSA as a constrained partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). Constrained POMDPs generally re quire randomized policies to achieve optimality, which are often intractable. By exploiting the rich structure of the underlying problem, we establish a separation principle for the joint design of OSA . pecifically, the optimal joint design can be carried out in two steps: first to choose the spectrum senso r and the access strategy to maximize the instantaneous throughput under a collision constraint , d then to choose the sensing strategy to maximize the overall throughput. This separation principl e reveals the optimality of myopic policies for the design of the spectrum sensor and the access strategy , leading to closed-form optimal solutions. Furthermore, decoupling the design of the sensing strategy from that of the spectrum sensor and the access strategy, the separation principle reduces the cons trained POMDP to an unconstrained one, which admits deterministic optimal policies. Numerical example s are provided to study the design tradeoffs, the interaction between the PHY layer spectrum sensor and th e MAC layer sensing and access strategies, and the robustness of the ensuing design to model mismatch.

[1]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I , 1968 .

[2]  Edward J. Sondik,et al.  The optimal control of par-tially observable Markov processes , 1971 .

[3]  Edward J. Sondik,et al.  The Optimal Control of Partially Observable Markov Processes over a Finite Horizon , 1973, Oper. Res..

[4]  N. Zhang,et al.  Algorithms for partially observable markov decision processes , 2001 .

[5]  Joseph Mitola Cognitive Radio for Flexible Mobile Multimedia Communications , 2001, Mob. Networks Appl..

[6]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[7]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Some Fundamental Limits on Cognitive Radio , 2004 .

[8]  Kiran Challapali,et al.  Spectrum Agile Radio: Detecting Spectrum Opportunities , 2004 .

[9]  M.E. Steenstrup,et al.  Opportunistic use of radio-frequency spectrum: a network perspective , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[10]  Wei Wang,et al.  List-coloring based channel allocation for open-spectrum wireless networks , 2005, VTC-2005-Fall. 2005 IEEE 62nd Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005..

[11]  Haitao Zheng,et al.  Collaboration and fairness in opportunistic spectrum access , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[12]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  A bandwidth sharing approach to improve licensed spectrum utilization , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[13]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[14]  K. Ramchandran,et al.  Detecting primary receivers for cognitive radio applications , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[15]  Q. Zhao,et al.  Decentralized cognitive mac for dynamic spectrum access , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[16]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Dynamic spectrum access in WLAN channels: empirical model and its stochastic analysis , 2006, TAPAS '06.

[17]  Qing Zhao,et al.  Distributed Cognitive MAC for Energy-Constrained Opportunistic Spectrum Access , 2006, MILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference.

[18]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access: Signal Processing, Networking, and Regulatory Policy , 2006, ArXiv.

[19]  George E. Monahan,et al.  A Survey of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes: Theory, Models, and Algorithms , 2007 .

[20]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Decentralized cognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: A POMDP framework , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Spectrum Access via Periodic Channel Sensing , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[22]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Structure and Optimality of Myopic Sensing for Opportunistic Spectrum Access , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.