Predictors of primary breast cancers responsiveness to preoperative Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy: translation of microarray data into clinically useful predictive signatures

BackgroundOur goal was to identify gene signatures predictive of response to preoperative systemic chemotherapy (PST) with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in patients with primary breast cancer.MethodsNeedle biopsies were obtained pre-treatment from 83 patients with breast cancer and mRNA was profiled on Affymetrix HG-U133A arrays. Response ranged from pathologically confirmed complete remission (pCR), to partial remission (PR), to stable or progressive disease, "N o C hange" (NC). A primary analysis was performed in breast tissue samples from 56 patients and 5 normal healthy individuals as a training cohort for predictive marker identification. Gene signatures identifying individuals most likely to respond completely to PST-EC were extracted by combining several statistical methods and filtering criteria. In order to optimize prediction of non responding tumors Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test were also applied. An independent cohort of 27 patients was used to challenge the predictive signatures. A k-Nearest neighbor algorithm as well as two independent linear partial least squares determinant analysis (PLS-DA) models based on the training cohort were selected for classification of the test samples. The average specificity of these predictions was greater than 74% for pCR, 100% for PR and greater than 62% for NC. All three classification models could identify all pCR cases.ResultsThe differential expression of 59 genes in the training and the test cohort demonstrated capability to predict response to PST-EC treatment. Based on the training cohort a classifier was constructed following a decision tree.First, a transcriptional profile capable to distinguish cancerous from normal tissue was identified. Then, a "favorable outcome signature" (31 genes) and a "poor outcome signature" (26 genes) were extracted from the cancer specific signatures. This stepwise implementation could predict pCR and distinguish between NC and PR in a subsequent set of patients. Both PLS-DA models were implemented to discriminate all three response classes in one step.ConclusionIn this study signatures were identified capable to predict clinical outcome in an independent set of primary breast cancer patients undergoing PST-EC.

[1]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  G. Getz,et al.  Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  B. Asselain,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operabla breast cancer , 1991 .

[4]  B. Asselain,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[5]  J. Albanell,et al.  Serial Topoisomerase II Expression in Primary Breast Cancer and Response to Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy , 2004, Oncology.

[6]  Charles Wang,et al.  Multi-class tumor classification by discriminant partial least squares using microarray gene expression data and assessment of classification models , 2004, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[7]  J. Warrington,et al.  Comparison of human adult and fetal expression and identification of 535 housekeeping/maintenance genes. , 2000, Physiological genomics.

[8]  P. Blondeel,et al.  The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer , 2003, Medical oncology.

[9]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  M. Ellis,et al.  Trawling for genes that predict response to breast cancer adjuvant therapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancers treated with intensive epirubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: are there molecular markers in the primary tumour that predict for 5-year clinical outcome? , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  H. Bojar,et al.  Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  J. Coindre,et al.  Primary chemotherapy in breast invasive carcinoma: predictive value of the immunohistochemical detection of hormonal receptors, p53, c-erbB-2, MiB1, pS2 and GST pi. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  D. Lockhart,et al.  Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  R. Wittes,et al.  Evaluation of the Cancer Patient and the Response to Treatment , 1987 .

[17]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2004 , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  W. Cance,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer , 2004, The American surgeon.

[19]  S. Datta,et al.  Exploring relationships in gene expressions: a partial least squares approach. , 2001, Gene expression.

[20]  Christine Solbach,et al.  Identification of high risk breast-cancer patients by gene expression profiling , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  U. Alon,et al.  Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  Response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[26]  R. Gray,et al.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: better late than never. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  Markus Ringnér,et al.  Multiclass discovery in array data , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[28]  Charles Zegar,et al.  Advantages and limitations of microarray technology in human cancer , 2003, Oncogene.

[29]  Danh V. Nguyen,et al.  Multi-class cancer classification via partial least squares with gene expression profiles , 2002, Bioinform..

[30]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Tissue classification with gene expression profiles. , 2000 .

[31]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[32]  J. Stec,et al.  Global Gene Expression Changes During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Human Breast Cancer , 2002, Cancer journal.

[33]  J. Bergh,et al.  Predictive value of p53, mdm-2, p21, and mib-1 for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[34]  L. Carey,et al.  Long-Term Outcome of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: Effective Clinical Downstaging Allows Breast Preservation and Predicts Outstanding Local Control and Survival , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[35]  J. Pierga,et al.  Prognostic factors for survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. the role of clinical response. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[36]  Van,et al.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  M. Marty,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and safety profile of oxaliplatin. , 1998, Seminars in oncology.

[38]  P. Chollet,et al.  Original Paper Clinical and Pathological Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Operable Breast Cancer , 1997 .

[39]  K R Coombes,et al.  Cancer genomics: promises and complexities. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[40]  J. Stec,et al.  Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  E. Lander,et al.  A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[42]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[43]  N. Dhanasekaran,et al.  The microrevolution: applications and impacts of microarray technology on molecular biology and medicine (review). , 2004, International journal of molecular medicine.

[44]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[45]  Danh V. Nguyen,et al.  Partial least squares proportional hazard regression for application to DNA microarray survival data , 2002, Bioinform..

[46]  Syed Mohsin,et al.  Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer , 2003, The Lancet.

[47]  L. Lipton,et al.  Preoperative/neoadjuvant medical therapy for early breast cancer. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[48]  D. Berry Chemotherapy is More Effective in Patients With Breast Cancer Not Expressing Steroid Hormone Receptors: A Study of Preoperative Treatment , 2006 .

[49]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Design of studies using DNA microarrays , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[50]  T. Petit,et al.  Comparative value of tumour grade, hormonal receptors, Ki-67, HER-2 and topoisomerase II alpha status as predictive markers in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[51]  E. Pavlidou,et al.  Can Patients' Likelihood of Benefiting from Primary Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Be Predicted Before Commencement of Treatment? , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[52]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Carcinoma of the Breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , 2004, Cancer.

[53]  M. Dowsett,et al.  The biology of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2002, Endocrine-related cancer.

[54]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[55]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Carcinoma of the Breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , 2004, Cancer.

[56]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Dietary supplementation with L-arginine in patients with breast cancer (> 4 cm) receiving multimodality treatment: report of a feasibility study. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[57]  S Charrier,et al.  Clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[58]  D. Generali,et al.  Cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity of the single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin plus tamoxifen as primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer: a single-institution phase III trial. , 2005, Endocrine-related cancer.

[59]  T. Powles,et al.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast carcinomas. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[60]  Yoonkyung Lee,et al.  Classification of Multiple Cancer Types by Multicategory Support Vector Machines Using Gene Expression Data , 2003, Bioinform..

[61]  H. Bojar,et al.  Predictive biological markers for response of invasive breast cancer to anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based primary (radio-)chemotherapy. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[62]  Maurice K. Wong,et al.  Algorithm AS136: A k-means clustering algorithm. , 1979 .

[63]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[64]  A. Luini,et al.  Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of three centimeters or more. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[65]  A. Waterworth Introducing the concept of breast cancer stem cells , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[66]  M. Tenenhaus,et al.  Prediction of clinical outcome with microarray data: a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) approach , 2003, Human Genetics.

[67]  E. Devilard,et al.  Gene expression profiles of poor-prognosis primary breast cancer correlate with survival. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[68]  P. Schleyer Encyclopedia of computational chemistry , 1998 .

[69]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[70]  Yingdong Zhao,et al.  Prospective molecular profiling of melanoma metastases suggests classifiers of immune responsiveness. , 2002, Cancer research.

[71]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Gene expression profiles derived from fine needle aspiration correlate with response to systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.