Determining the threshold of acceptability for an interfering audio programme

An experiment was performed in order to establish the threshold of acceptability for an interfering audio programme on a target audio programme, varying the following physical parameters: target programme, interferer programme, interferer location, interferer spectrum, and road noise level. Factors were varied in three levels in a Box-Behnken fractional factorial design. The experiment was performed in three scenarios: information gathering, entertainment, and reading/working. Nine listeners performed a method of adjustment task to determine the threshold values. Produced thresholds were similar in the information and entertainment scenarios, however there were significant differences between subjects, and factor levels also had a significant effect: interferer programme was the most important factor across the three scenarios, whilst interferer location was the least important.

[1]  S. Bech,et al.  Spatial aspects of reproduced sound in small rooms. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J Nemecek,et al.  Noise in landscaped offices. , 1973, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  E. C. Keighley,et al.  The determination of acceptability criteria for office noise , 1966 .

[4]  S A Falk,et al.  Hospital noise--levels and potential health hazards. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[6]  C S Watson,et al.  Auditory psychophysics and perception. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  D. Bishop.  Judgments of the relative and absolute acceptability of aircraft noise. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Evy Öhrström,et al.  Laboratory annoyance and different traffic noise sources , 1980 .

[10]  B. Moore,et al.  A Model of Loudness Applicable to Time-Varying Sounds , 2002 .

[11]  Emmanuel Vincent,et al.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio Source Separation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[12]  S. Sörensen,et al.  Annoyance reactions from aircraft noise exposure , 1972 .

[13]  S Fidell.  Nationwide urban noise survey. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Empirical Determination of Sound Isolation Requirements for Recording Studio Isolation Booths , 1992 .

[15]  A. Hesse.  Comparison of several psychophysical procedures with respect to threshold estimates, reproducibility and efficiency , 1986 .

[16]  Ville Pulkki,et al.  Spatial Sound Reproduction with Directional Audio Coding , 2007 .

[17]  G. Box,et al.  Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables , 1960 .

[18]  Murray Campbell,et al.  Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics , 2013 .

[19]  Leonard Daoussis,et al.  Musical Preferences and Effects of Music on a Reading Comprehension Test for Extraverts and Introverts , 1986 .

[20]  Florian Wickelmaier,et al.  Perceptual Audio Evaluation - Theory, Method and Application , 2006 .

[21]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[22]  Jari Korhonen,et al.  Unacceptability of instantaneous errors in mobile television: from annoying audio to video , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[23]  Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems , 2015 .

[24]  Eric Benjamin,et al.  Preferred Listening Levels in the Automotive Environment , 2005 .

[25]  E. Boman,et al.  Factors Affecting Pupils’ Noise Annoyance in Schools , 2004 .