Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade

SYNAPTIC plasticity dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors is thought to underlie certain types of learning and memory1–3. In support of this, both hippocampal long-term potentiation and spatial learning in a watermaze are impaired by blocking NMDA receptors with a selective antagonist D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5)4 or by a mutation in one of the receptor subunits5. Here we report, however, that the AP5-induced learning deficit can be almost completely prevented if rats are pretrained in a different watermaze before administration of the drug. This is not because of stimulus generalization, and occurs despite learning of the second task remaining hippocampus dependent. An A PS5-induced learning deficit is, however, still seen if the animals are pretrained using a non-spatial task. Thus, despite its procedural simplicity, the watermaze may involve multiple cognitive processes with distinct pharmacological properties; although required for some component of spatial learning, NMDA receptors may not be required for encoding the spatial representation of a specific environment.

[1]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning , 1971 .

[2]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[3]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[4]  G. Collingridge,et al.  Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral‐commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A comparison of the contributions of the frontal and parietal association cortex to spatial localization in rats. , 1983, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[7]  T. Salt,et al.  Mediation of thalamic sensory input by both NMDA receptors and non-NMDA receptors , 1986, Nature.

[8]  G. Lynch,et al.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5 , 1986, Nature.

[9]  R. Kesner,et al.  Spatial cognitive maps: differential role of parietal cortex and hippocampal formation. , 1988, Behavioral Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Contributions of cingulate cortex to two forms of spatial learning and memory , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Yehuda,et al.  The use of the Morris Water Maze in the study of memory and learning. , 1989, The International journal of neuroscience.

[12]  R. Morris Synaptic plasticity and learning: selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor antagonist AP5 , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  L. Jarrard On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  N. Daw,et al.  The effect of varying stimulus intensity on NMDA-receptor activity in cat visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Harley,et al.  MK-801 and AP5 impair acquisition, but not retention, of the Morris milk maze , 1990, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[16]  A. Sillito,et al.  The contribution of thenon-N-methyl-d-aspartate group of excitatory amino acid receptors to retinogeniculate transmission in the cat , 1990, Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Morris,et al.  The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Johnston,et al.  NMDA-receptor-independent long-term potentiation. , 1992, Annual review of physiology.

[19]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[20]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[21]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. , 1993, Science.

[22]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Spatial memory and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists APV and MK-801: memory impairments depend on familiarity with the environment, drug dose, and training duration. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  B L McNaughton,et al.  LTP saturation and spatial learning disruption: effects of task variables and saturation levels , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Robert Thomas Exitatory Amino Acids in Health and Disease , 1995 .

[25]  T. Yagi,et al.  Reduced hippocampal LTP and spatial learning in mice lacking NMDA receptor ε1 subunit , 1995, Nature.

[26]  G. Collingridge,et al.  The NMDA Receptor , 1995 .