Post-buckled precompressed (PBP) piezoelectric actuators for UAV flight control

This paper presents the use of a new class of flight control actuators employing Post-Buckled Precompressed (PBP) piezoelectric elements in morphing wing Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The new actuator relies on axial compression to amplify deflections and control forces simultaneously. Two designs employing morphing wing panels based on PBP actuators were conceived. One design employed PBP actuators in a membrane wing panel over the aft 60% of the chord to impose roll control on a 720mm span subscale UAV. This design relied on a change in curvature of the actuators to control the camber of the airfoil. Axial compression of the actuators was ensured by means of rubber bands and increased end rotation levels with almost a factor of two up to ±13.6° peak-to-peak, with excellent correlation between theory and experiment. Wind tunnel tests quantitatively proved that wing morphing induced roll acceleration levels in excess of 1500 deg/s2. A second design employed PBP actuators in a wing panel with significant thickness, relying on a highly compliant Latex skin to allow for shape deformation and at the same time induce an axial force on the actuators. Bench tests showed that due to the axial compression provided by the skin end rotations were increased with more than a factor of two up to ±15.8° peak-to-peak up to a break frequency of 34Hz. Compared to conventional electromechanical servoactuaters, the PBP actuators showed a net reduction in flight control system weight, slop and power consumption for minimal part count. Both morphing wing concepts showed that PBP piezoelectric actuators have significant benefits over conventional actuators and can be successfully applied to induce aircraft control.

[1]  Ronald Barrett Adaptive Aerostructures: Improving Militarily Enabled, High Performance Subscale UAVs , 2004 .

[2]  Diann Brei,et al.  Analytical Dynamic Performance Modeling for Individual C-block Actuators , 1999 .

[3]  J. D. Ervin,et al.  Recurve piezoelectric-strain-amplifying actuator architecture , 1998 .

[4]  Ron Barrett,et al.  DESIGN AND TESTING OF SUBSONIC ALL-MOVING SMART FLIGHT CONTROL SURFACES , 1995 .

[5]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Post-Buckled Precompressed (PBP) Actuators: Enhancing VTOL Autonomous High Speed MAVs , 2005 .

[6]  Diann Brei,et al.  Force-deflection behavior of piezoelectric C-block actuator arrays , 1999 .

[7]  George A. Lesieutre,et al.  Can a Coupling Coefficient of a Piezoelectric Device be Higher Than Those of Its Active Material? , 1997, Smart Structures.

[8]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Missile flight control using active flexspar actuators , 1995, Smart Structures.

[9]  Roelof Vos,et al.  Post-buckled precompressed (PBP) elements: a new class of flight control actuators enhancing high-speed autonomous VTOL MAVs , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  R. Jones,et al.  Mechanics of Composite Materials , 2018 .

[11]  E. Crawley,et al.  Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures , 1987 .

[12]  Richard B. Bramlette,et al.  A Method for Control Surface Deflection Utilizing Piezoceramic Bimorph Actuators , 2006 .

[13]  Ron Barrett,et al.  TECHNICAL NOTE: Design and testing of a 1/12th-scale solid state adaptive rotor , 1997 .

[14]  R. Barrett,et al.  Development of a piezoceramic flight control surface actuator for highly compressed munitions , 1998 .