An efficient unsupervised fetal QRS complex detection from abdominal maternal ECG

Non-invasive fetal heart rate is of great relevance in clinical practice to monitor fetal health state during pregnancy. To date, however, despite significant advances in the field of electrocardiography, the analysis of abdominal fetal ECG is considered a challenging problem for biomedical and signal processing communities. This is mainly due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of fetal ECG and difficulties in cancellation of maternal QRS complexes, motion and electromyographic artefacts. In this paper we present an efficient unsupervised algorithm for fetal QRS complex detection from abdominal multichannel signal recordings combining ICA and maternal ECG cancelling, which outperforms each single method. The signal is first pre-processed to remove impulsive artefacts, baseline wandering and power line interference. The following steps are then applied: maternal ECG extraction through independent component analysis (ICA); maternal QRS detection; maternal ECG cancelling through weighted singular value decomposition; enhancing of fetal ECG through ICA and fetal QRS detection. We participated in the Physionet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2013, obtaining the top official scores of the challenge (among 53 teams of participants) of event 1 and event 2 concerning fetal heart rate and fetal interbeat intervals estimation section. The developed algorithms are released as open-source on the Physionet website.

[1]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[2]  Carlo Marchesi,et al.  Performance Comparison of Fast QRS Detection Algorithms , 1984 .

[3]  Banu Onaral,et al.  Electrical Properties of Bioelectrodes , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  S. Cerutti,et al.  Variability analysis of fetal heart rate signals as obtained from abdominal electrocardiographic recordings , 1986, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[5]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  Shahriar Negahdaripour,et al.  A new method for the extraction of fetal ECG from the composite abdominal signal , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Joos Vandewalle,et al.  Fetal electrocardiogram extraction by blind source subspace separation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Noninvasive fetal electrocardiogram extraction: blind separation versus adaptive noise cancellation , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Marian Kotas,et al.  Projective filtering of time-aligned ECG beats , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Dirk Callaerts,et al.  Comparison of SVD methods to extract the foetal electrocardiogram from cutaneous electrode signals , 1990, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  A robust fetal ECG detection method for abdominal recordings , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[13]  Reza Sameni,et al.  Extraction of Fetal Cardiac Signals from an Array of Maternal Abdominal Recordings , 2008 .

[14]  Christian Jutten,et al.  A Deflation Procedure for Subspace Decomposition , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Alberto Macerata,et al.  A multi-step approach for non-invasive fetal ECG analysis , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[16]  Reza Sameni,et al.  Noninvasive fetal ECG: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2013 , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[17]  Julien Oster,et al.  Non-invasive FECG extraction from a set of abdominal sensors , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[18]  Christian Jutten,et al.  Fetal ECG Extraction by Extended State Kalman Filtering Based on Single-Channel Recordings , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  Non-invasive fetal ECG analysis , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[20]  I. Horváth,et al.  Established methodological issues in electronic nose research: how far are we from using these instruments in clinical settings of breath analysis? , 2015, Journal of breath research.