Effectiveness of incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Norway

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Battery Electric vehicles (BEVs) shift pollution off the road and to potentially less damaging and more varied sources than petroleum. Depending on the source of electricity, a transition to electrified personal transportation can dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. However current EVs tend to be more expensive and have shorter range, which can hinder public adoption. Government incentives can be used to alleviate these factors and encourage adoption. Norway has a long history incentivizing BEV adoption including measures such as exemption from roadway tolls, access to charging infrastructure, point of sale tax incentives, and usage of public bus use limited lanes. This paper analyzed the sales of electric vehicles on a regional and municipal basis in Norway and then cross analyzed these with the corresponding local demographic data and incentive measures to attempt to ascertain which factors lead to higher BEV adoption. It was concluded that access to BEV charging infrastructure, being adjacent to major cities, and regional incomes had the greatest predictive power for the growth of BEV sales. It was also concluded that short-range vehicles showed somewhat more income and unemployment sensitivity than long-range vehicles. Toll exemptions and the right to use bus designated lanes do not seem to have statistically significant predictive power for BEV sales in our linear municipal-level models, but this could be due to neighboring major cities containing those incentive features.

[1]  Ole Henrik Hannisdahl,et al.  The future is electric! The EV revolution in Norway — Explanations and lessons learned , 2013, 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27).

[2]  R. Scholz,et al.  Reducing energy consumption in road transport through hybrid vehicles: investigation of rebound effects, and possible effects of tax rebates , 2007 .

[3]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Getting the Most Out of Electric Vehicle Subsidies , 2012 .

[4]  Sten Karlsson,et al.  On the distribution of individual daily vehicle driving distances , 2014 .

[5]  B. Wee,et al.  The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[6]  Randi Hjorthol,et al.  Attitudes, ownership and use of Electric Vehicles – a review of literature , 2013 .

[7]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  US residential charging potential for electric vehicles , 2013 .

[8]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .

[9]  D. Diamond The impact of government incentives for hybrid-electric vehicles: Evidence from US states , 2009 .

[10]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  David Banister,et al.  Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution , 2012 .

[12]  Inês L. Azevedo,et al.  The impact of federal incentives on the adoption of hybrid electric vehicles in the United States , 2013 .

[13]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid, or Electric - What Do Car Buyers Want? , 2013 .

[14]  Kyle W Meisterling,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Denis Bolduc,et al.  Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada , 2008 .

[16]  Board on Energy,et al.  Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels , 2013 .

[17]  Antonio Sánchez-Braza,et al.  Main drivers for local tax incentives to promote electric vehicles: The Spanish case , 2014 .

[18]  Peter E. Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[19]  Changzheng Liu,et al.  Analyzing the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S. , 2014 .

[20]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies , 2008 .

[21]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[22]  Shanjun Li,et al.  Gasoline Prices, Government Support, and the Demand for Hybrid Vehicles in the United States , 2011 .

[23]  David A. King,et al.  Indirect emissions from electric vehicles: emissions from electricity generation , 2010 .

[24]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  Green Drivers or Free Riders? An Analysis of Tax Rebates for Hybrid Vehicles , 2010 .

[25]  Steven J. Skerlos,et al.  Targeting plug-in hybrid electric vehicle policies to increase social benefits , 2010 .

[26]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[27]  Georg Bühler,et al.  The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles , 2012 .

[28]  Peter Mock,et al.  A GLOBAL COMPARISON OF FISCAL INCENTIVE POLICY FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES , 2014 .

[29]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology , 2008 .

[30]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles , 2009 .

[31]  Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan,et al.  Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway , 2016 .

[32]  P. Haan,et al.  How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars—Part I: Model structure, simulation of bounded rationality, and model validation , 2009 .

[33]  Margaret J. Eppstein,et al.  An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2011 .