Sonification and Music, Music and Sonification

Despite it being more than twenty years since the launch of an international conference series dedicated to its study, there is still much debate over what sonification really is, and especially as regards its relationship to music. A layman’s definition of sonification might be that it is the use of non-speech audio to communicate data, the aural counterpart to visualization. Many researchers have claimed musicality for their sonifications, generally when using data-to-pitch mappings. In 2006 Bennett Hogg and I (Vickers and Hogg 2006) made a rather provocative assertion that bound music and sonification together (q.v., and further developed in Vickers (2006)), not so much to claim an ontological truth but to foreground a debate that has simmered since the first International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD) in 1992. Since then there has been an increasing number of musical and sonic art compositions driven by the data of natural phenomena, some of which are claimed by their authors to be sonifications. This chapter looks at some of the issues surrounding the relationship between sonification and music and at developments that have the potential to draw sonification and the sonic arts into closer union.

[1]  Paul Vickers,et al.  External Auditory Representations of Programs: Past, Present, and Future an Aesthetic Perspective , 2004, ICAD.

[2]  Paul Vickers,et al.  Ars Informatica -- Ars Electronica: Improving Sonification Aesthetics , 2005 .

[3]  Leigh Landy,et al.  Understanding the Art of Sound Organization , 2007 .

[4]  Philip Kortum,et al.  AUDITORY STIMULUS DESIGN: MUSICALLY INFORMED , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas Hermann,et al.  TAXONOMY AND DEFINITIONS FOR SONIFICATION AND AUDITORY DISPLAY , 2008 .

[6]  Marc Leman,et al.  A Framework for Music-based Interactive Sonification , 2010, ICAD 2010.

[7]  Enactive consciousness, intertextuality, and musical free improvisation: deconstructing mythologies and finding connections , 2011 .

[8]  Scot Gresham-Lancaster,et al.  Relationships of sonification to music and sound art , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[9]  Stephen Barrass.  The aesthetic turn in sonification towards a social and cultural medium , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[10]  Stephen Barrass.  Sonifications for concert and live performance , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[11]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  The Sonification Handbook , 2011 .

[12]  Thomas Hermann,et al.  Laboratory Methods for Experimental Sonification , 2011 .

[13]  Tuomas Eerola,et al.  Formulating a Revised Taxonomy for Modes of Listening , 2012 .

[14]  A. Supper.  Lobbying for the ear : the public fascination with and academic legitimacy of the sonification of scientific data , 2012 .

[15]  Paul Vickers,et al.  Ways of Listening and Modes of Being: Electroacoustic Auditory Display , 2013, ArXiv.

[16]  Paul Vickers,et al.  The CAITLIN Auralization System: Hierarchical Leitmotif Design as a Clue to Program Comprehension , 2013, ArXiv.

[17]  Paul Vickers,et al.  Sonification Abstraite/Sonification Concrète: An 'Aesthetic Perspective Space' for Classifying Auditory Displays in the Ars Musica Domain , 2006, ArXiv.

[18]  Paul Vickers,et al.  Understanding Visualization: A Formal Approach Using Category Theory and Semiotics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  David Worrall.  Can Micro-Gestural Inflections Be Used to Improve the Soniculatory Effectiveness of Parameter Mapping Sonifications? , 2014 .

[20]  Natasha Barrett,et al.  Aftershock: A science–art collaboration through sonification , 2014 .

[21]  Michael Filimowicz,et al.  Peircing Fritz and Snow: An aesthetic field for sonified data , 2014, Organised Sound.

[22]  Thomas Hermann,et al.  Interactive Sonification for Data Exploration: How listening modes and display purposes define design guidelines , 2014, Organised Sound.