Adult Interactions and Child Engagement

The purposes of this study were to investigate how engagement varied as a function of concurrent adult interactions (e.g., individual versus group orientation, type of teacher interaction) and pre-existing states (e.g., age, ratings of typical engagement). Eleven child care teachers and 63 children were videotaped in 93 naturally occurring child care situations. Two teacher interaction categories, elaborations and information giving, were associated with participatory engagement, attention, and low engagement. Interaction behaviors that were responsive without providing direction and those that were directive without responding to children were not associated with engagement. Individually targeted interactions produced more engagement than did group-targeted interactions. Chronological age, developmental age, and ratings of persistence did not statistically significantly affect engagement.

[1]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[2]  D. Bailey,et al.  Using Growth Curve Analysis to Evaluate Child Change in Longitudinal Investigations , 1994 .

[3]  S. Odom,et al.  Early Intervention for Infants and Children With Handicaps: An Empirical Base , 1988 .

[4]  D. Messer,et al.  Assessment of Mastery Behavior at 30 Months: Analysis of Task-Directed Activities. , 1987 .

[5]  P. Dale,et al.  Individual Differences in Language Delayed Children's Responses to Direct and Interactive Preschool Instruction , 1991 .

[6]  D. Bailey,et al.  Effects of Classroom Social Structure and Disability on Engagement , 1995 .

[7]  P. Dale,et al.  Interaction between Early Intervention Curricula and Student Characteristics , 1993 .

[8]  Michael Kalinowski,et al.  National Association for the Education of Young Children , 1991 .

[9]  L. Nabors,et al.  Quality of center child care and infant cognitive and language development. , 1996, Child development.

[10]  S F Warren,et al.  Facilitating prelinguistic communication skills in young children with developmental delay. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  G. Mahoney,et al.  The Effects of Directive Communications on Children's Interactive Engagement , 1996 .

[12]  John B. Willett,et al.  Questions and Answers in the Measurement of Change , 1988 .

[13]  R. Tannock,et al.  Improving Joint Engagement in Parent-Child Interaction , 1994 .

[14]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing Change , 1987 .

[15]  S. Warren,et al.  Predicting Children's Response to Prelinguistic Communication Intervention , 1995 .

[16]  S. Warren.  Facilitating Basic Vocabulary Acquisition with Milieu Teaching Procedures , 1992 .

[17]  Melissa B. Wakely,et al.  Classification of teachers’ interaction behaviors in early childhood classrooms☆ , 2000 .

[18]  S. Warren,et al.  The Role of Directives in Early Language Intervention , 1995 .

[19]  L. Adamson,et al.  Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. , 1984, Child development.

[20]  R. A. McWilliam,et al.  Multivariate relationships among developmental age, global engagement, and observed child engagement , 1999 .

[21]  D. Crimmins,et al.  Effect of Three Adult Interaction Styles on Infant Engagement , 1994 .

[22]  H. Goldstein,et al.  What's Natural About Naturalistic Language Intervention? , 1996 .

[23]  G. Mahoney.  Maternal communication style with mentally retarded children. , 1988, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[24]  S. Bredekamp.  Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 , 1987 .

[25]  A. Kaiser,et al.  An exploratory study of the interaction between language teaching methods and child characteristics. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  R. Mcwilliam,et al.  The Reliability of Observations of Young Children's Engagement , 1994 .