Direct Demonstration of an Adaptive Constraint

The role of constraint in adaptive evolution is an open question. Directed evolution of an engineered β-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase (IMDH), with coenzyme specificity switched from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP), always produces mutants with lower affinities for NADP. This result is the correlated response to selection for relief from inhibition by NADPH (the reduced form of NADP) expected of an adaptive landscape subject to three enzymatic constraints: an upper limit to the rate of maximum turnover (kcat), a correlation in NADP and NADPH affinities, and a trade-off between NAD and NADP usage. Two additional constraints, high intracellular NADPH abundance and the cost of compensatory protein synthesis, have ensured the conserved use of NAD by IMDH throughout evolution. Our results show that selective mechanisms and evolutionary constraints are to be understood in terms of underlying adaptive landscapes.

[1]  M. McPeek,et al.  The dynamics of evolutionary stasis , 2005, Paleobiology.

[2]  J. Hurley,et al.  Structure of 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase in complex with NAD+: ligand-induced loop closing and mechanism for cofactor specificity. , 1994, Structure.

[3]  S. Zamenhof,et al.  Study of Microbial Evolution through Loss of Biosynthetic Functions: Establishment of “Defective” Mutants , 1967, Nature.

[4]  A. Dean,et al.  Redesigning secondary structure to invert coenzyme specificity in isopropylmalate dehydrogenase. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. , 1995, Science.

[6]  Robert M. Stroud,et al.  Catalytic mechanism of NADP(+)-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase: implications from the structures of magnesium-isocitrate and NADP+ complexes. , 1991 .

[7]  J. Antonovics,et al.  Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Barry G. Hall,et al.  Predicting Evolution by In Vitro Evolution Requires Determining Evolutionary Pathways , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[10]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  Michael R. Rose,et al.  Variation in the reversibility of evolution , 2000, Nature.

[12]  F. Arnold,et al.  How enzymes adapt: lessons from directed evolution , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[13]  Stephen P. Miller,et al.  The Biochemical Architecture of an Ancient Adaptive Landscape , 2005, Science.

[14]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space , 1970, Nature.

[15]  A. Dean,et al.  Protein engineering reveals ancient adaptive replacements in isocitrate dehydrogenase. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Natural Selection and Developmental Constraints in the Evolution of Allometries , 2005, Science.

[17]  K. J. Andrews,et al.  Selective disadvantage of non-functional protein synthesis inEscherichia coli , 1976, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[18]  G. Petsko,et al.  Crystal structures of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase and comparison with their thermophilic counterpart from Thermus thermophilus. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  A. L. Koch The protein burden oflac operon products , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[21]  D. Dykhuizen SELECTION FOR TRYPTOPHAN AUXOTROPHS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI IN GLUCOSE‐LIMITED CHEMOSTATS AS A TEST OF THE ENERGY CONSERVATION HYPOTHESIS OF EVOLUTION , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[23]  L. Otten,et al.  Directed evolution: selecting today's biocatalysts. , 2005, Biomolecular engineering.

[24]  A. Dean,et al.  The Selective Cause of an Ancient Adaptation , 2005, Science.