Comparison of computational intelligence algorithms for loadability enhancement of restructured power system with FACTS devices

Abstract This paper proposes the use of computational intelligence algorithms to determine the optimal location and control of Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices to enhance the loadability of pool and hybrid models in restructured power system. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Differential Evolution (DE) and Composite Differential Evolution (CoDE) algorithms are used and their performances were compared. For this study, Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator (TCSC), Static VAR Compensator (SVC) and Thyristor Controlled Phase Shifting Transformer (TCPST) are considered. This approach uses AC load flow equations with constraints on real and reactive power generations, transmission line flow, magnitude of bus voltages and FACTS device settings. For the hybrid model, bilateral transactions are modeled using secured bilateral transaction matrix utilizing the AC distribution factor with slack bus contribution. Simulations are performed on IEEE 118 bus system. Maximum loadability, computation time and convergence characteristics are compared. The results indicate that by optimal location and control of FACTS devices, DE enhances the loadability of the pool and hybrid models with less computation time and faster convergence than PSO. Further the performance of DE is improved by using its variant, CoDE. Among the three FACTS devices, TCSC gives maximum loadability than SVC and TCPST. To conclude, for enhancing the loadability of restructured power system with FACTS devices using the computational intelligence algorithm, DE with TCSC gives maximum loadability with less computational time and faster convergence. The computational effort is further reduced by using CoDE.

[1]  A. Sharma Optimal Number and Location of TCSC and Loadability Enhancement in Deregulated Electricity Markets Using MINLP , 2006 .

[2]  S.N. Singh,et al.  Placement of FACTS controllers for enhancing power system loadability , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power India Conference.

[3]  S. Jalali,et al.  Determination of location and amount of series compensation to increase power transfer capability , 1998 .

[4]  F. Galiana,et al.  Studies of bilateral contracts with respect to steady-state security in a deregulated environment [of electricity supply] , 1998 .

[5]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[6]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Optimization of Non-Linear Chemical Processes using Modified Differential Evolution , 2005, IICAI.

[7]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[8]  Peerapol Jirapong,et al.  Optimal allocation of FACTS devices to enhance total transfer capability using evolutionary programming , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[9]  Boon-Teck Ooi,et al.  Assessment and control of the impact of FACTS devices on power system performance , 1996 .

[10]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems , 1999 .

[11]  Amit Konar,et al.  Two improved differential evolution schemes for faster global search , 2005, GECCO '05.

[12]  P. N. Suganthan,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Amit Konar,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization and Differential Evolution Algorithms: Technical Analysis, Applications and Hybridization Perspectives , 2008, Advances of Computational Intelligence in Industrial Systems.

[14]  M. A. Abido,et al.  Differential evolution algorithm for emission constrained economic power dispatch problem , 2010 .

[15]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Restructured Electrical Power Systems: Operation: Trading, and Volatility , 2001 .

[16]  S. Chanana,et al.  New secure bilateral transaction determination and study of pattern under contingencies and UPFC in competitive hybrid electricity markets , 2009 .

[17]  S. J. Cheng,et al.  Application and comparison of computational intelligence techniques for optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC , 2010, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  F. Galiana,et al.  Studies of bilateral contracts with respect to steady-state security in a deregulated environment , 1997, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications.

[19]  Ivana Kockar,et al.  Combined pool/bilateral dispatch. I. Performance of trading strategies , 2002 .

[20]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Differential Evolution With Composite Trial Vector Generation Strategies and Control Parameters , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  M. Saravanan,et al.  Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability , 2007 .

[22]  Swagatam Das,et al.  An improved differential evolution algorithm with fitness-based adaptation of the control parameters , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[23]  Enrique Acha,et al.  FACTS: Modelling and Simulation in Power Networks , 2004 .

[24]  Georgios C. Stamtsis,et al.  Optimal choice and allocation of FACTS devices in deregulated electricity market using genetic algorithms , 2004, IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004..

[25]  Amit Konar,et al.  Differential Evolution Using a Neighborhood-Based Mutation Operator , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[26]  Ya-Chin Chang,et al.  Transmission System Loadability Enhancement Study by Ordinal Optimization Method , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Ivana Kockar,et al.  Phase shifter placement in large-scale systems via mixed integer linear programming , 2003 .

[28]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  A mathematical framework for the analysis and management of power transactions under open access , 1998 .