Two and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.

Following the development of the first automated methods in the 1980s, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) has undergone substantial evolution from simplistic computer-assisted methods of visual interpretation of coronary angiograms to recently introduced three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative analysis algorithms. The ability of QCA to provide objective dimensional assessment of coronary lesions is still useful and has led to its widespread application in both scientific research and clinical practice. Most of the systems available nowadays are based on vessel edge detection algorithms to designate the arterial lumen on conventional two-dimensional coronary angiograms. Three generations of these systems have been developed with improved accuracy and precision of obtained measurements. Techniques for reconstruction of the two-dimensional coronary angiogram in space have allowed the implementation of three-dimensional QCA. This new technology may solve many of the limitations inherent in two-dimensional QCA and provide stenosis assessment capabilities not available with two-dimensional imaging.

[1]  Peter Wilde,et al.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: transient simulations. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  M. Webb-Peploe,et al.  Angiographic quantitation of the results of coronary angioplasty: where do we stand? , 1990, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[4]  R. Jabara,et al.  Comparison of Multidetector 64-Slice Computed Tomographic Angiography to Coronary Angiography to Assess the Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts , 2007 .

[5]  Raghava R. Gollapudi,et al.  CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Original Studies Utility of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Coronary Angiography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2007 .

[6]  J. Messenger,et al.  3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: Clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients , 2000, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[7]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.

[9]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[10]  A. Both,et al.  The Objective Measurement Of Coronary Obstructions By Digital Image Processing , 1982, Other Conferences.

[11]  C L Feldman,et al.  Intravascular hemodynamic factors responsible for progression of coronary atherosclerosis and development of vulnerable plaque. , 2000, Current opinion in cardiology.

[12]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Correlation of Coronary Arteriograms and Left Ventriculograms with Postmortem Studies , 1977, Circulation.

[13]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Mechanism of the effect of coronary artery stenosis on coronary flow in the dog. , 1975, American heart journal.

[14]  Babak Movassaghi,et al.  Rotational angiography (RA) and three-dimensional imaging (3-DRA): an available clinical tool , 2006, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  J. Hermiller,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[16]  John D. Carroll,et al.  3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Feasibility and safety of guidewire navigation using a magnetic navigation system in coronary artery stenoses. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  P. Serruys,et al.  In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B): comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography. , 2007, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  E L Bolson,et al.  A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  C A Mistretta,et al.  A technique of scatter and glare correction for videodensitometric studies in digital subtraction videoangiography. , 1982, Radiology.

[21]  L D Fisher,et al.  Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). , 1982, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[22]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  J. Messenger,et al.  Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: A three‐dimensional analysis of physician‐determined vs. computer‐generated views , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  A Crowther,et al.  Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation. , 1988, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[26]  Demosthenes G. Katritsis,et al.  Hemodynamic factors and atheromatic plaque rupture in the coronary arteries: from vulnerable plaque to vulnerable coronary segment , 2007, Coronary artery disease.

[27]  P. Serruys,et al.  Magnetic navigation system used successfully to cross a crushed stent in a bifurcation that failed with conventional wires , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[28]  R. Kerber,et al.  Assessing the physiologic significance of coronary obstructions in patients: importance of diffuse undetected atherosclerosis. , 1988, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[29]  Nikos Stergiopulos,et al.  Shear stress, vascular remodeling and neointimal formation. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  D. Katritsis,et al.  Cardiac phase-related variability of border detection or densitometric quantitation of postangioplasty lumens. , 1990, American heart journal.

[31]  S. Paulin,et al.  Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms. , 1983, Circulation.

[32]  C J Slager,et al.  Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[33]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Progress in quantitative coronary arteriography , 2012, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[34]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Comparative in‐vitro validation of eight first- and second‐generation quantitative coronary angiography systems , 1997, Coronary artery disease.

[35]  M. LeFree,et al.  Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.

[36]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[37]  A James O'Malley,et al.  Comparison of thrombosis and restenosis risk from stent length of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[38]  M J Davies,et al.  Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. , 1986, British heart journal.

[39]  Gary S. Mintz,et al.  Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronically Occluded Coronary Arteries: A Consensus Document Part II , 2005, Circulation.

[40]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Instantaneous Flow Response and Regional Distribution During Coronary Hyperemia as Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 1974 .

[41]  P. Serruys,et al.  True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. , 2000, Circulation.

[42]  William J. Sanders,et al.  Quantitation Of Coronary Artery Dimensions Using Digital Image Processing , 1981, Other Conferences.

[43]  Hadar Marom,et al.  Bifurcation lesions in the coronary arteries: early experience with a novel 3-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis before and after stenting. , 2007, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[44]  J. H. C. Reiber,et al.  State of the Art in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1986, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[45]  Hadar Marom,et al.  Three‐dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single‐plane coronary angiograms: in vivo quantitative validation , 2005, International journal of cardiovascular interventions.

[46]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard". , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  John D Carroll,et al.  Three-dimensional vascular angiography. , 2004, Current problems in cardiology.

[48]  D. Dvir,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: Novel 3‐dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[49]  J. Reiber,et al.  Is there an effect of flat‐panel‐based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography? , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[50]  D. Katritsis,et al.  Limitations of coronary angiography: An underestimated problem? , 1991, Clinical cardiology.

[51]  J. Murray,et al.  Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.

[52]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: Evaluation in stented vessel segments , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[53]  George D. Giannoglou,et al.  Flow parameters in normal left coronary artery tree. Implication to atherogenesis , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[54]  E. Gronenschild,et al.  CAAS. II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[55]  C. J. Kooijman,et al.  Quantitative angiography of the left anterior descending coronary artery: correlations with pressure gradient and results of exercise thallium scintigraphy. , 1985, Circulation.

[56]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Approaches towards standardization in acquisition and quantitation of arterial dimensions from cineangiograms , 1986 .

[57]  M Siebes,et al.  Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[58]  W. Roberts,et al.  Accuracy of Angiographic Determination of Left Main Coronary Arterial Narrowing: Angiographic‐Histologic Correlative Analysis in 28 Patients , 1981, Circulation.

[59]  Subha V Raman,et al.  Rotational X‐ray coronary angiography , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[60]  S. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[61]  Pierfrancesco Agostoni,et al.  Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[62]  Kenneth G. Morris,et al.  Multiuser environment for the display and processing of digital cardiac angiographic images , 1990, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[63]  L. Santoro,et al.  Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[64]  P D Esser,et al.  Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms. , 1984, Circulation.

[65]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[66]  I C Cooper,et al.  Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method. , 1988, American heart journal.

[67]  C. Hamm,et al.  Radiation dose exposure in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[68]  Lambros Kaiktsis,et al.  Wall shear stress: theoretical considerations and methods of measurement. , 2007, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[69]  T Sandor,et al.  Cine-densitometric measurement of coronary arterial stenoses. , 1979, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[70]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Three‐dimensional on‐line reconstruction of coronary bifurcated lesions to optimize side‐branch stenting , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[71]  C. Vrints,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat‐panel system , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[72]  E J Topol,et al.  Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[73]  J. Reiber,et al.  A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[74]  K. Gould,et al.  Dynamic coronary stenosis. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[75]  G. Gensini,et al.  Quantitative angiography: the measurement of coronary vasomobility in the intact animal and man. , 1971, Chest.