Collaborative Play in World of Warcraft

Summary form only given. The author discusses play in World of Warcraft, a popular massively multiplayer online game. World of Warcraft enables self-organizing groups of strangers and friends to collaborate on short-term objectives. Such collaborations may reflect coming changes in globalized work in which we increasingly work with remote others we know little about. In game play, the glue that keeps groups together is the shared objective of completing a "quest" or mission, as well as the shared culture of the game. The game is rich in meaning with a strong narrative, a material culture of weapons, armor, potions, recipes, jewelry, and many other goods, as well as a vibrant economy. Players' backgrounds are diverse but discourse emphasizes understandings about the game rather than players' personal lives. Players learn to be at ease with strangers, to get things done with others they don't know and may never interact with again. The game diminishes some of the impact of things that divide us such as ethnicity, gender, and age, through sharing the game

[1]  Marek Bell,et al.  CSCW at play: 'there' as a collaborative virtual environment , 2004, CSCW.

[2]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Whither or whether HCI: requirements analysis for multi-sited, multi-user cyberinfrastructures , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  B. Weitz,et al.  Productive Play , 2006 .

[4]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  "Alone together?": exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games , 2006, CHI.

[5]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .

[6]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Education , 1938 .

[7]  T. L. Taylor,et al.  Power games just want to have fun?: instrumental play in a MMOG , 2003, DiGRA Conference.

[8]  R. Driskell,et al.  Are Virtual Communities True Communities? Examining the Environments and Elements of Community , 2002 .

[9]  Constance Steinkuehler.  Cognition and learning in massively multiplayer online games: A critical approach , 2005 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  The social side of gaming: a study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game , 2004, CSCW.

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[14]  Judith S. Donath,et al.  Hiding and revealing in online poker games , 2004, CSCW.

[15]  Neeti Gupta,et al.  FishPong: encouraging human-to-human interaction in informal social environments , 2004, CSCW.

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[17]  Michael Twidale,et al.  CSC: computer supported collaborative work, learning, and play , 2005, CSCL.

[18]  M. Prince,et al.  Social support deficits, loneliness and life events as risk factors for depression in old age. The Gospel Oak Project VI , 1997, Psychological Medicine.

[19]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[20]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[21]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .