That robot is not for me: Addressing stereotypes of aging in assistive robot design

Assistive robots designed to support independently living older adults are expected to solve diverse physical, social and mental challenges related to aging. This paper presents how older adults-the potential users of assistive robots-interpret robotic technologies in terms of their usefulness and fit in their everyday lives. We interviewed 7 older adults aged 57-72, showing them photos and videos of assistive robots designed with their age group in mind. Most participants saw the robots as potentially useful in general terms, yet also commented that “those robots are not for me.” An analysis of their discussion about the robots identified several aspects of robot design that participants found problematic, particularly negative representations of aging depicted in robot use scenarios. Participants saw issues related to aging as important daily problems, but did not appreciate the manner in which robotics was expected to address those issues. They were particularly sensitive to the dominance of stereotypes defining aging primarily in terms of disability in robotics discourse and design. Based on participant feedback, we suggest a broader understanding of the experience of aging as the basis for future assistive robot design for this population, and conclude by discussing related robot design possibilities.

[1]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with disparity in wheelchair customizability among people with traumatic spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Robots in Society, Society in Robots , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Understanding the Potential for Robot Assistance for Older Adults in the Home Environment , 2011 .

[4]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[5]  Louis Neven,et al.  'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[6]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Antonis A. Argyros,et al.  Hobbit , a care robot supporting independent living at home : First prototype and lessons learned , 2015 .

[9]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Cecilia E. Garcia Cena,et al.  ROAD: domestic assistant and rehabilitation robot , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  William Sims Bainbridge,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology , 2002 .

[12]  Martin Hägele,et al.  Robotic home assistant Care-O-bot® 3 - product vision and innovation platform , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts.

[13]  Katie Brittain,et al.  An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research , 2015, TCHI.

[14]  Goldie Nejat,et al.  Brian 2.1: A socially assistive robot for the elderly and cognitively impaired , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[15]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction Research to Improve Quality – An Approach and Issues , 2011 .

[16]  Markus Vincze,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots for the Aging Population: Are We Trapped in Stereotypes? , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[18]  B. MacDonald,et al.  Attitudes towards health‐care robots in a retirement village , 2012, Australasian journal on ageing.

[19]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[20]  Sebastian Glende,et al.  Increasing the Acceptance of Assistive Robots for Older People Through Marketing Strategies Based on Stakeholder Needs , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[21]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[22]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Wheelesley: A Robotic Wheelchair System: Indoor Navigation and User Interface , 1998, Assistive Technology and Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  Observational study of naturalistic interactions with the socially assistive robot PARO in a nursing home , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[24]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Weiser's dream in the Korean home: collaborative study of domestic roles, relationships, and ideal technologies , 2013, UbiComp.