Evolving Structure in Liquid Music

A software application called “Musical Gene Pool” is described. It was designed to evolve non-linear music from an initial random soup of sounds, which play continuously. Most evolutionary music systems to date require the user to select for musical aspects in a piecemeal fashion, whereas this system is experienced as continuous music throughout the entire process, as follows: a human listener gives fitness rewards after sounds (organisms) emerge from the gene pool, take turns playing, and return back to the pool. Organisms start out unicellular (one sound), but as the listener selectively rewards random sequences deemed more musical than others, some organisms join up to form larger, multicellular organisms – which become phrases or extended musical gestures. Genetic operators of splitting, death, replication, and mutation occur in the gene pool among rewarded organisms. This results in gradual evolution of structure as the music continues to play. This emerges in response to the listener’s own internal emerging musical language, based on accumulated musical memory. This structure is liquid – continually able to flow and rearrange to allow serendipity. While there is a limit to organism length (duration of phrases), it is proposed that the interactive scheme could be adjusted to evolve increasingly larger organisms, and hence, longer musical passages. These would essentially be mobile chunks of linear music with self-similarity in their structures – revealing the histories of their evolution.

[1]  Günther R. Raidl,et al.  Applications of evolutionary computing : EvoWorkshops 2004 : EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, and EvoSTOC, Coimbra, Portugal, April 5-7, 2004 : proceedings , 2004 .

[2]  Tanya Vladimirova,et al.  Generation of Musical Sequences with Genetic Techniques , 1999, Computer Music Journal.

[3]  Franz Rothlauf,et al.  Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2005: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, and EvoSTOC, Lausanne, Switzerland, March 30 - April 1, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, EvoWorkshops.

[4]  Mats G. Nordahl,et al.  Living Melodies: Coevolution of Sonic Communication , 2001, Leonardo.

[5]  D. Polan,et al.  Noise: The Political Economy of Music , 1989 .

[6]  Fred Lerdahl,et al.  Tonal Pitch Space , 2001 .

[7]  James Gleick,et al.  Chaos, Making a New Science , 1987 .

[8]  Andrew R. Brown Opportunities for Evolutionary Music Composition , 2002 .

[9]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Too many love songs: Sexual selection and the evolution of communication , 1997 .

[10]  J. Attali,et al.  Noise: The Political Economy of Music , 1989 .

[11]  J. Hawkins,et al.  On Intelligence , 2004 .

[12]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[13]  Rolf Drechsler,et al.  Applications of Evolutionary Computing , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  P. Todd,et al.  Musical networks: Parallel distributed perception and performance , 1999 .

[15]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Evolutionary Computer Music , 2007 .

[16]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[17]  Susan Wright,et al.  Towards Melodic Extension Using Genetic Algorithms , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Elena Marchiori,et al.  Applications of Evolutionary Computing: Evoworkshops 2003 , 2003 .