Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives

This paper describes a three-phase approach to assist research and development managers in obtaining the most attractive project portfolio. The screening procedure of the first phase identifies project proposals that are worthy of further evaluation keeping the number of projects entering the subsequent phase within a manageable size. In the second phase, a multiobjective integer linear programming model determines the solution space of all efficient (i.e., Pareto-optimal) portfolios. It takes into account time profiles of the objectives, various project interdependencies, logical and strategic requirements, as well as resource and benefit constraints. The third phase, finally, aims to find a portfolio which fits the decision-maker's notions. Starting with an arbitrarily selected candidate he/she iteratively sets aspiration levels for objectives or modifies upper and lower bounds. Thus, the solution space is explored until a satisfying compromise between the figures both in benefit and resource categories is reached. Our approach is numerically tractable, and, as a key feature, requires no a priori assumptions about the decision-maker's preferences. Its application is illustrated by an example.

[1]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  Intra-set point generation and filtering in decision and criterion space , 1980, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Joel N. Morse,et al.  Reducing the size of the nondominated set: Pruning by clustering , 1980, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  Norman R. Baker,et al.  Economic Models for R and D Project Selection in the Presence of Project Interactions , 1984 .

[5]  Tomislav Mandakovic,et al.  R&D Project Selection Models , 1986 .

[6]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  An interactive approach to R&D project selection and termination , 1988 .

[7]  Y. Gousty,et al.  An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection , 1988 .

[8]  Ari P. J. Vepsalainen,et al.  Analysis of R&D portfolio strategies for contract competition , 1988 .

[9]  A. Sánchez R&D Project Selection Strategy: an empirical study in Spain , 1989 .

[10]  A. Feinberg,et al.  A two-phase methodology for technology selection and system design , 1989 .

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Planning models for research and development , 1990 .

[12]  Y. Takeda,et al.  A managerial approach to research and development cost-effectiveness evaluation , 1990 .

[13]  Jeffrey L. Ringuest,et al.  The linear R&D project selection problem: an alternative to net present value , 1990 .

[14]  Robert L. Schmidt,et al.  An improved discrete dynamic programming algorithm for allocating resources among interdependent projects , 1991 .

[15]  Geoff Lockett,et al.  A decision support system using judgmental modeling: a case of R&D in the pharmaceutical industry , 1991 .

[16]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Multiple criteria decision support - A review , 1992 .

[17]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[18]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Recent developments in screening methods for nondominated solutions in multiobjective optimization , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  W. Stadje Optimal selection of R&D projects , 1993 .

[20]  Robert L. Schmidt,et al.  A model for R&D project selection with combined benefit, outcome and resource interactions , 1993 .

[21]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  Selecting product development projects: pioneering versus incremental innovation strategies , 1993 .

[22]  Euiho Suh,et al.  Prioritizing telecommunications technologies for long-range R&D planning to the year 2006 , 1994 .

[23]  M. Wolff Meet Your Competition: Data from the IRI R&D Survey , 1994 .

[24]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  A strategic decision model for the selection of advanced technology , 1994 .

[25]  J. Martino Research and Development project selection , 1995 .

[26]  S. Venkatraman,et al.  R&D project selection and scheduling for organizations facing product obsolescence , 1995 .

[27]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  E. Roberts Benchmarking the Strategic Management of Technology—I , 1995 .

[29]  K. Heidenberger Dynamic project selection and funding under risk: A decision tree based MILP approach , 1996 .

[30]  S. Rengarajan,et al.  Project selection by scoring for a large R&D organisation in a developing country , 1997 .

[31]  Derek B. Dove,et al.  Development and application of a new tool for lithographic mask evaluation, the stepper equivalent Aerial Image Measurement System, AIMS , 1997, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[32]  E. Pennings,et al.  R&D as an option on market introduction , 1998 .

[33]  Christian Stummer,et al.  Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modelling approaches , 1999 .

[34]  A. D. Henriksen,et al.  A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool , 1999 .

[35]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management : Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[36]  Xavier Gandibleux,et al.  A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization , 2000, OR Spectr..

[37]  Jeffrey L. Ringuest,et al.  Conditional stochastic dominance in R&D portfolio selection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[38]  Christian Stummer,et al.  Interactive R&D portfolio selection considering multiple objectives, project interdependencies, and time: a three-phase approach , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[39]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selecting R&D projects at BMW: a case study of adopting mathematical programming models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[40]  Richard F. Hartl,et al.  Pareto Ant Colony Optimization: A Metaheuristic Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Selection , 2004, Ann. Oper. Res..