Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality.

Accumulation of evidence models of perceptual decision making have been able to account for data from a wide range of domains at an impressive level of precision. In particular, Ratcliff's (1978) diffusion model has been used across many different 2-choice tasks in which the response is executed via a key-press. In this article, we present 2 experiments in which we used a letter-discrimination task exploring 3 central aspects of a 2-choice task: the discriminability of the stimulus, the modality of the response execution (eye movement, key pressing, and pointing on a touchscreen), and the mapping of the response areas for the eye movement and the touchscreen conditions (consistent vs. inconsistent). We fitted the diffusion model to the data from these experiments and examined the behavior of the model's parameters. Fits of the model were consistent with the hypothesis that the same decision mechanism is used in the task with 3 different response methods. Drift rates are affected by the duration of the presentation of the stimulus while the response execution time changed as a function of the response modality.

[1]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[2]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[3]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Ratcliff A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. , 1981 .

[5]  Adele Diederich,et al.  Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time , 2003 .

[6]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  A ballistic model of choice response time. , 2005, Psychological review.

[8]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Domain General Mechanisms of Perceptual Decision Making in Human Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[11]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[12]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[13]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[15]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[16]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inhibition in Superior Colliculus Neurons in a Brightness Discrimination Task? , 2011, Neural Computation.

[17]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy , 2009 .

[18]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[19]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. , 2010, Psychological review.

[20]  S. Link The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[21]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[22]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[23]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[24]  M. Stone Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[25]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[26]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A model of the go/no-go task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[28]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[30]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.