The Force of Numbers: Investigating Manual Signatures of Embodied Number Processing

The study has two objectives: (1) to introduce grip force recording as a new technique for studying embodied numerical processing; and (2) to demonstrate how three competing accounts of numerical magnitude representation can be tested by using this new technique: the Mental Number Line (MNL), A Theory of Magnitude (ATOM) and Embodied Cognition (finger counting-based) account. While 26 healthy adults processed visually presented single digits in a go/no-go n-back paradigm, their passive holding forces for two small sensors were recorded in both hands. Spontaneous and unconscious grip force changes related to number magnitude occurred in the left hand already 100–140 ms after stimulus presentation and continued systematically. Our results support a two-step model of number processing where an initial stage is related to the automatic activation of all stimulus properties whereas a later stage consists of deeper conscious processing of the stimulus. This interpretation generalizes previous work with linguistic stimuli and elaborates the timeline of embodied cognition. We hope that the use of grip force recording will advance the field of numerical cognition research.

[1]  Olivier Renaud,et al.  Permutation Tests for Regression, ANOVA, and Comparison of Signals: The permuco Package , 2021, J. Stat. Softw..

[2]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Stimulating numbers: signatures of finger counting in numerosity processing , 2020, Psychological research.

[3]  Karima Mersad,et al.  Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses , 2018, Psychological Research.

[4]  Thomas J. Faulkenberry,et al.  Tracking the Continuous Dynamics of Numerical Processing: A Brief Review and Editorial , 2018, J. Numer. Cogn..

[5]  E. Hubbard,et al.  On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[6]  Y. Delevoye-Turrell,et al.  Seeing action simulation as it unfolds: The implicit effects of action scenes on muscle contraction evidenced through the use of a grip-force sensor , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Deconstructing spatial-numerical associations , 2018, Cognition.

[8]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Commentary: The mental representation of integers: An abstract-to-concrete shift in the understanding of mathematical concepts , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[9]  V. Frak,et al.  Manual action verbs modulate the grip force of each hand in unimanual or symmetrical bimanual tasks , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  David C. Geary,et al.  Language and culture in mathematical cognition , 2018 .

[11]  Michael J. Wiemers,et al.  Two Attributes of Number Meaning: Numerical Associations With Visual Space and Size Exist in Parallel , 2017, Experimental psychology.

[12]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Finger posing primes number comprehension , 2017, Cognitive Processing.

[13]  R. Núñez Is There Really an Evolved Capacity for Number? , 2017, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[14]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  A simple technique to study embodied language processes: the grip force sensor , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[15]  R. Verleger,et al.  Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  Agustín Ibáñez,et al.  A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Gamble on gaze: Eye movements reflect the numerical value of blackjack hands , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  F. Mast,et al.  Counting is a spatial process: evidence from eye movements , 2016, Psychological research.

[19]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Ocular drift along the mental number line , 2016, Psychological Research.

[20]  Aditya Jain,et al.  A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students , 2015, International journal of applied & basic medical research.

[21]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Embodied number processing , 2015 .

[22]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition , 2015 .

[23]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Pushing forward in embodied cognition: may we mouse the mathematical mind? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Grasping numbers: evidence for automatic influence of numerical magnitude on grip aperture , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Expyriment: A Python library for cognitive and neuroscientific experiments , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[27]  Viviane Deprez,et al.  Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Different Brains Process Numbers Differently: Structural Bases of Individual Differences in Spatial and Nonspatial Number Representations , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  Robyn Carson,et al.  Easy methods for extracting individual regression slopes: Comparing SPSS, R, and Excel , 2013 .

[31]  M. Fabbri Finger Counting Habits and Spatial-Numerical Association in Horizontal and Vertical Orientations , 2013 .

[32]  Viviane Deprez,et al.  Grip Force Reveals the Context Sensitivity of Language-Induced Motor Activity during “Action Words” Processing: Evidence from Sentential Negation , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Meaning and the brain: The neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge , 2012, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[34]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[35]  P. Jaśkowski,et al.  Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect? , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[36]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Finger Counting and Numerical Cognition , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[37]  Yi-Fang Hsu,et al.  The time course of symbolic number adaptation: Oscillatory EEG activity and event-related potential analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  You can count on the motor cortex: Finger counting habits modulate motor cortex activation evoked by numbers , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[40]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  A Hand Full of Numbers: A Role for Offloading in Arithmetics Learning? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[41]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Graspable Objects Shape Number Processing , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Finger Counting Habits in Middle Eastern and Western Individuals: An Online Survey , 2011 .

[43]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial–numerical associations , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Grip Force Is Part of the Semantic Representation of Manual Action Verbs , 2010, PloS one.

[45]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Congruency effects between number magnitude and response force. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain , 2009, Brain and Language.

[47]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[49]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[50]  S. Mitra,et al.  Sub-processes of working memory in the N-back task: An investigation using ERPs , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[51]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters? , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping , 2008, Cortex.

[54]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations , 2008, Cortex.

[55]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[56]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[59]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[60]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  Wim Fias,et al.  Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[62]  L. Jonkman,et al.  The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood; a Go/Nogo ERP study , 2006, Brain Research.

[63]  Wim Fias,et al.  Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Michael Andres,et al.  Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction , 2004, Neuroreport.

[65]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial representations in number processing--evidence from a pointing task , 2003 .

[67]  M. Schlag-Rey,et al.  Through the eye, slowly; Delays and localization errors in the visual system , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[68]  S Rossi,et al.  Corticospinal excitability modulation to hand muscles during movement imagery. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[69]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Predicting arithmetical achievement from neuro-psychological performance: a longitudinal study , 1998, Cognition.

[70]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  W. Fias The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[72]  A. Gevins,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of component processes in human working memory. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[73]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[74]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[75]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[76]  D. Balota,et al.  Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: reevaluation of the two-process model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review , 1984 .

[78]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[79]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[80]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.