Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences

Previous research has indicated that the cognitive load imposed by tasks in various content domains increases with the complexity of the relational information processed. Sentence comprehension entails processing noun-verb relations to determinewho did what to whom. The difficulty of object-extracted relative clause sentences might stem from the complex noun-verb relations they entail. Across three studies, participants read 16 types of object- and subject-extracted relative clause sentences at their own pace and then responded to a comprehension question for each sentence. Relational processing was assessed using a premise integration task or a Latin square task. These tasks predicted comprehension of object-relatives before and after controlling for subject-relatives. Working memory (WM) capacity was assessed using reading span or forward and backward digit span tests. WM tasks predicted comprehension of object-relatives before but not after controlling for subject-relatives. Comprehension of object-relatives relied more heavily on a domain-general capacity to process complex relations than on WM capacity.

[1]  George A. Miller,et al.  Free Recall of Self-Embedded English Sentences , 1964, Inf. Control..

[2]  Steven Phillips,et al.  Increased bilateral occipitoparietal activity during retention of binary versus unary indexed lists in pair recognition , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Braine,et al.  Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences , 1974 .

[4]  G. Halford Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[5]  Cristina Romani,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-components view. , 1994 .

[6]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Short-term memory does not involve the "working memory" of information processing: The demise of a common assumption , 1983 .

[7]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Children's ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity , 1998 .

[8]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[9]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1999 .

[10]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Processing capacity limits are not explained by storage limits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  David Caplan,et al.  Individual differences in rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: effects of working memory and speed of processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  G. Waters,et al.  Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[14]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Fodor,et al.  Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity , 1967 .

[16]  James K. Kroger,et al.  Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Marily Ford,et al.  A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences , 1983 .

[18]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Processing Load and Children's Comprehension of Relative Clause Sentences. , 1998 .

[19]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  David Caplan,et al.  Verbal Working Memory and on-Line Syntactic Processing: Evidence from self-Paced Listening , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  G. Halford,et al.  A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task , 2002 .

[23]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Integration of Category Induction and Hierarchical Classification: One Paradigm at Two Levels of Complexity , 2002 .

[24]  D. Stuss,et al.  Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  G. Waters,et al.  The relationship between measures of working memory and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[27]  G. Halford,et al.  Young children's performance on the balance scale: the influence of relational complexity. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[29]  Arthur L. Blumenthal,et al.  Observations with self-embedded sentences , 1966 .

[30]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[31]  Graeme S Halford,et al.  Theory of mind and relational complexity. , 2003, Child development.

[32]  G. Waters,et al.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[33]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[34]  G. Halford,et al.  Young children’s understanding of oddity: reducing complexity by simple oddity and “most different” strategies , 2003 .

[35]  Allen Newell,et al.  Deduction as verbal reasoning. , 1995 .

[36]  Richard L. Lewis Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Mathematics Education: Models and Processes , 1995 .

[38]  S. Phillips,et al.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[39]  J. Bain,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article How Many Variables Can Humans Process? , 2022 .

[40]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[42]  Barry K. Rosen,et al.  Syntactic Complexity , 1974, Inf. Control..

[43]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[44]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[45]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[46]  M. Maybery,et al.  The development of memory and processing capacity. , 1994, Child development.

[47]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention : selection, awareness, and control : a tribute to Donald Broadbent , 1996 .

[48]  J. Bain,et al.  Information-Processing Demands of Transitive Inference , 1986 .

[49]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[50]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences , 1968 .

[51]  M. Just,et al.  Aphasic Sentence Comprehension as a Resource Deficit: A Computational Approach , 1997, Brain and Language.

[52]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[53]  David Caplan,et al.  Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 2001 .

[54]  A. Sheldon The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[55]  EmbeddingsRichard L. LewisDepartment A Theory of Grammatical But Unacceptable , 1996 .

[56]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[57]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses , 2005 .

[58]  D Burns,et al.  Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[60]  G. Waters,et al.  Working memory and online syntactic processing in Alzheimer's disease: studies with auditory moving window presentation. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[61]  J. Bain,et al.  Capacity Limitations in Children's Reasoning: A Dual-Task Approach. , 1986 .

[62]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Measuring the Influence of Complexity on Relational Reasoning , 2006 .

[63]  James K. Kroger,et al.  Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Relational Integration during Reasoning , 2001, NeuroImage.

[64]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[66]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Working memory or working attention , 1993 .