Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial

Background and Purpose— The European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) have shown that endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in certain patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis. However, they differed in the degree of stenosis above which surgery was reported to be effective. This disparity has led to inconsistent clinical recommendations but may have been due to differences between the trials in the methods of measurement of carotid stenosis and definitions of outcome events. Methods— To allow direct comparison of analyses from ECST and NASCET, we remeasured the prerandomization ECST carotid angiograms and redefined the outcome events the same way as in NASCET. Results— We randomized 3018 patients and followed them up for a mean of 73 months. Surgery reduced the 5-year risk of any stroke or surgical death by 5.7% (95% CI, 0 to 11.6) in patients with 50% to 69% stenosis (n=646, P =0.05) and by 21.2% (95% CI, 12.9 to 29.4) in patients with 70% to 99% stenosis without “near occlusion” (n=429, P <0.0001). These benefits were maintained at the 10-year follow-up. However, surgery was of no benefit in patients (n=125) with near occlusion. The effect of surgery in this group was highly significantly different from that in patients with 70% to 99% stenosis without near occlusion (P =0.002). Surgery was harmful in patients with <30% stenosis (n=1321, P =0.007) and of no benefit in patients with 30% to 49% stenosis (n=478, P =0.6). Conclusions— Results of the ECST and NASCET were consistent when analyzed in the same way. In ECST, surgery was highly beneficial for 70% to 99% stenosis and moderately beneficial for 50% to 69% stenosis. However, contrary to clinical recommendations and current practice, surgery was of little benefit in patients with carotid near occlusion.

[1]  W. S. Fields,et al.  Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. V. Progress report of prognosis following surgery or nonsurgical treatment for transient cerebral ischemic attacks and cervical carotid artery lesions. , 1970 .

[2]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Is self-audit reliable? , 1995, The Lancet.

[3]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  L. Hollier,et al.  Surgery for Stroke , 1993 .

[5]  Thompson G. Robinson,et al.  National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. , 2001 .

[6]  C. Warlow,et al.  Prediction of benefit from carotid endar terectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study , 1999, The Lancet.

[7]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[10]  Ralph G. Dacey,et al.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis , 1991 .

[11]  S. Gutnikov,et al.  Overall results of a pooled analysis of individual patient data from trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis , 2001, Stroke.

[12]  T. Jensen,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group , 1991 .

[13]  R. Bloch,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[14]  J. Slattery,et al.  A systematic review of the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[15]  H. Schouten,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[16]  G. Sicard.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis: European Carotid Surgery Trialist' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43 , 1992 .

[17]  P. Gorelick,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy. Where do we draw the line? , 2000, Gefässchirurgie.

[18]  J. Slattery,et al.  Equivalence of Measurements of Carotid Stenosis: A Comparison of Three Methods on 1001 Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[19]  L. Wilkins.  North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. , 1991, Stroke.

[20]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision-making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Authors' reply , 2001 .

[21]  A. Hingorani,et al.  Pseudo-occlusions of the internal carotid artery: a rationale for treatment on the basis of a modified carotid duplex scan protocol. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  A. Buchan.  North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. The Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with Moderate and Severe Stenosis. , 1998 .

[23]  P. Rothwell,et al.  The importance of angiographically defined collateral circulation in patients with severe carotid stenosis , 2000 .

[24]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making , 2001, Neurology.

[25]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[26]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Peter M. Rothwell,et al.  Analysis of agreement between measurements of continuous variables: general principles and lessons from studies of imaging of carotid stenosis , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[28]  L. Erdoes,et al.  Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with color-flow Doppler. , 1995, Stroke.

[29]  W Ceusters,et al.  Endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis: interim results from the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial , 1996, The Lancet.

[30]  G. S. Venables,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy in patients with transient cerebral ischaemia , 1984, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[31]  A. Davies,et al.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis , 1995, BMJ.

[32]  A. Buchan,et al.  *North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Methods, Patients Characteristics and Progress. , 1991 .

[33]  Eugene Z. Oddone,et al.  Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis , 1995 .

[34]  E L Hannan,et al.  The fall and rise of carotid endarterectomy in the United States and Canada. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  W. M. Krushat,et al.  Epidemiology of carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries: 1985-1996 update. , 1998, Stroke.

[36]  Peter M. Rothwell,et al.  Major Variation in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy: A Possible Risk Factor for Plaque Development? , 2001, Stroke.

[37]  J. Toole,et al.  Comparison of Multicenter Study Designs for Investigation of Carotid Endarterectomy Efficacy , 1992, Stroke.

[38]  K. Einhäupl,et al.  Differences in medical and surgical therapy for stroke prevention between leading experts in North America and Western Europe. , 1998, Stroke.

[39]  R. F. Smith,et al.  Further Comments on the Measurement of Carotid Stenosis From Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[40]  S. Gutnikov,et al.  A pooled analysis of individual patient data from trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: efficacy of surgery in important subgroups , 2001 .

[41]  S. Pendlebury,et al.  Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. , 2000, Stroke.

[42]  J. Grotta,et al.  The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery , 1997, Neurology.

[43]  J. Toole,et al.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. , 1998, Stroke.

[44]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  The so-called atheromatous pseudoocclusion of the internal carotid artery , 1983, Neuroradiology.

[45]  Peter M. Rothwell,et al.  Sex Differences in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy and the Distribution of Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2001, Stroke.

[46]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. , 2000, Stroke.

[47]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy , 2001, Neurology.

[48]  H. Barnett,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy and the measurement of stenosis. , 1993, Stroke.

[49]  Carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1995, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.