EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 2: Exploring decision rules for clinical utility

BACKGROUND Synovial inflammation (as defined by hypertrophy and effusion) is common in osteoarthritis (OA) and may be important in both pain and structural progression. OBJECTIVE To determine if decision rules can be devised from clinical findings and ultrasonography (US) to allow recognition of synovial inflammation in patients with painful knee OA. METHODS A EULAR-ESCISIT cross sectional, multicentre study enrolled subjects with painful OA knee who had clinical, radiographic, and US evaluations. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to find combinations of predictor variables that would provide high sensitivity and specificity for clinically detecting synovitis and effusion in individual subjects. A range of definitions for the two key US variables, synovitis and effusion (using different combinations of synovial thickness, depth, and appearance), were also included in exploratory analyses. RESULTS 600 patients with knee OA were included in the analysis. For both knee synovitis and joint effusion, the sensitivity and specificity were poor, yielding unsatisfactory likelihood ratios (75% sensitivity, 45% specificity, and positive LR of 1.36 for knee synovitis; 71.6% sensitivity, 43.2% specificity, and positive LR of 1.26 for joint effusion). The exploratory analyses did not improve the sensitivity and specificity (demonstrating positive LRs of between 1.26 and 1.57). CONCLUSION Although it is possible to determine clinical and radiological predictors of OA inflammation in populations, CART analysis could not be used to devise useful clinical decision rules for an individual subject. Thus sensitive imaging techniques such as US remain the most useful tool for demonstrating synovial inflammation of the knee at the individual level.

[1]  O. Steinbrocker,et al.  Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1949, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[2]  F. Wolfe,et al.  Evaluation and documentation of rheumatoid arthritis disease status in the clinic: which variables best predict change in therapy. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  Timothy E. McAlindon,et al.  Osteoarthritis: New Insights , 2002 .

[4]  K. Brandt,et al.  Synovial inflammation in patients with early osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  W. Grassi,et al.  Ultrasonography in rheumatology: an evolving technique , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  D. Kane,et al.  Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[7]  M. Smith,et al.  Synovial membrane inflammation and cytokine production in patients with early osteoarthritis. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[8]  P. Emery,et al.  The current status of ultrasonography in rheumatology. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[9]  M. Dougados,et al.  EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: Prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  R. McCarney,et al.  Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  D. Felson,et al.  An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  C. Werning [Rheumatoid arthritis]. , 1983, Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten.

[14]  T. Spector,et al.  Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Ultrasonography in Arthritis of the Knee , 1995, Acta radiologica.

[16]  L. Kazis,et al.  Knee effusions, popliteal cysts, and synovial thickening: association with knee pain in osteoarthritis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  R. Marshall The use of classification and regression trees in clinical epidemiology. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  J. S. Lawrence,et al.  The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism , 1964 .

[19]  J. Hinde,et al.  Models for diagnosing chest pain: is CART helpful? , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  P. Emery,et al.  Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee: a comparison with arthroscopy and clinical examination. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  S. Lemon,et al.  Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: Methodological review and comparison with logistic regression , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[22]  J. Reginster,et al.  Degenerative musculoskeletal disease , 2003, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[23]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  J Simonnet,et al.  Arthroscopic evaluation of post-traumatic patellofemoral chondropathy. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[25]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  P. Rosch Osteoarthritis: new insights. , 2002, Annals of internal medicine.

[27]  K R Hess,et al.  Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.