Shape partitioning interacts with global shape integration

Objects are often identified by the shape of their profiles but complex objects are often comprised of multiple articulated components. It has been proposed that complex objects are decomposed and recognized by their component parts. This study exploits the proposition that the visual system decomposes objects at matched deep concavities on their boundaries. Rapid decreases in thresholds for detection of sinusoidal deformation of a circle's radius with number of cycles of modulation shows that shape information is integrated around radial frequency (RF) patterns. Here we merge RF patterns to form composite patterns with concavities and show that integration around the RF patterns is disrupted if the concavities are shallow but preserved if they are deep, consistent with their decomposition at matched deep concavities. Geon theory identifies complex patterns through a structural description of viewpoint invariant primitives known as geons. Geons are defined by properties on their boundaries that co-occur in a non-accidental manner across viewpoint changes rather than by reconciling metric properties such as curvature with viewpoint specific templates. Similarly, shapes of RF patterns are defined by the positions of curvature features on their boundaries. We argue that RF patterns provide flexible stimuli that might be used to study geons.

[1]  Vanessa K Bowden,et al.  Visual search reveals a critical component to shape. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[2]  Wu Li,et al.  Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  I. Biederman Recognizing depth-rotated objects: a review of recent research and theory. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[4]  J Edwin Dickinson,et al.  Convergent evidence for global processing of shape. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[5]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Alex S. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling probability and additive summation for detection across multiple mechanisms under the assumptions of signal detection theory. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[7]  Frances Wilkinson,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00039-X , 1998 .

[8]  I. Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .

[9]  Nadejda Bocheva,et al.  Perceived location of two-dimensional patterns , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  S. McKee,et al.  Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[11]  I. Biederman Geon theory as an account of shape recognition in mind and brain , 1993 .

[12]  G. Meinhardt,et al.  A new angle on contour integration: The role of corners , 2017 .

[13]  J Edwin Dickinson,et al.  Detecting shape change: characterizing the interaction between texture-defined and contour-defined borders. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[14]  J Edwin Dickinson,et al.  Integration of shape information occurs around closed contours but not across them. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[15]  H. Wilson A transducer function for threshold and suprathreshold human vision , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Matthew F Tang,et al.  Separate banks of information channels encode size and aspect ratio. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[17]  C. Connor,et al.  Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  C. Connor,et al.  Population coding of shape in area V4 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Badcock,et al.  Near Their Thresholds for Detection, Shapes Are Discriminated by the Angular Separation of Their Corners , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Local and global contributions to shape discrimination , 2003, Vision Research.

[24]  Vanessa K Bowden,et al.  Global shape processing: A behavioral and electrophysiological analysis of both contour and texture processing. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[25]  Quick Rf A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[26]  Robert J. Green,et al.  Global processing of random-phase radial frequency patterns but not modulated lines. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[27]  Alex S. Baldwin,et al.  Rejecting probability summation for radial frequency patterns, not so Quick! , 2016, Vision Research.

[28]  J Edwin Dickinson,et al.  Further evidence that local cues to shape in RF patterns are integrated globally. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[29]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[30]  R. Watt,et al.  Families of models for gabor paths demonstrate the importance of spatial adjacency. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[31]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Radial frequency adaptation suggests polar-based coding of local shape cues , 2008, Vision Research.

[32]  I. Biederman,et al.  Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[34]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Perceptual saliency of points along the contour of everyday objects: A large-scale study , 2008 .

[36]  Jason Bell,et al.  Local motion effects on form in radial frequency patterns. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[37]  Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al.  Shape recognition: convexities, concavities and things in between , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[38]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian Reanalyses from Summary Statistics : A Guide for Academic Consumers , 2018 .

[39]  Vanessa K Bowden,et al.  Modulated textures with shape structures implied by a closed flow are processed globally. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[40]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[41]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[43]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[45]  D. Badcock,et al.  Tolerance for local and global differences in the integration of shape information. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[46]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Are judgements of circularity local or global? , 1999, Vision Research.

[47]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[49]  C. Connor,et al.  Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  A biologically plausible model of human radial frequency perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[51]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale integrative study , 2006, Cognition.