Bring mental activity into action! An enhanced online co-adaptive brain-computer interface training protocol

Non-stationarity and inherent variability of the noninvasive electroencephalogram (EEG) makes robust recognition of spontaneous EEG patterns challenging. Reliable modulation of EEG patterns that a BCI can robustly detect is a skill that users must learn. In this paper, we present a novel online co-adaptive BCI training paradigm. The system autonomously screens users for their ability to modulate EEG patterns in a predictive way and adapts its model parameters online. Results of a supporting study in seven first-time BCI users with disability are very encouraging. Three of 7 users achieved online accuracy > 70% for 2-class BCI control after 24 minutes of training. Online performance in 6 of 7 users was significantly higher than chance level. Online control was based on one single bipolar EEG channel. Beta band activity carried most discriminant information. Our fully automatic co-adaptive online approach allows to evaluate whether user benefit from current BCI technology within a reasonable timescale.

[1]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Brain–computer interfacing: more than the sum of its parts , 2012, Soft Computing.

[3]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Visualization of significant ERD/ERS patterns in multichannel EEG and ECoG data , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  V Kaiser,et al.  Motor imagery-induced EEG patterns in individuals with spinal cord injury and their impact on brain–computer interface accuracy , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Individually Adapted Imagery Improves Brain-Computer Interface Performance in End-Users with Disability , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  A Co-Adaptive Brain-Computer Interface for End Users with Severe Motor Impairment , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[8]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  C. Neuper,et al.  The effect of distinct mental strategies on classification performance for brain-computer interfaces. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  C. Neuper,et al.  Whatever Works: A Systematic User-Centered Training Protocol to Optimize Brain-Computer Interfacing Individually , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[13]  Horst Bischof,et al.  The Self-Paced Graz Brain-Computer Interface: Methods and Applications , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Autocalibration and Recurrent Adaptation: Towards a Plug and Play Online ERD-BCI , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Predictability of Brain-Computer Communication , 2004 .

[16]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Co-adaptive calibration to improve BCI efficiency , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Non-motor tasks improve adaptive brain-computer interface performance in users with severe motor impairment , 2014, Front. Neurosci..