Facies Relationships and Stratigraphic Architecture of Distal, Mixed Tide- and Wave-Influenced Deltaic Deposits: Lower Sego Sandstone, Western Colorado, U.S.A.

Abstract The facies characteristics and stratigraphic architectures of ancient mixed, wave- and tide-influenced deltas are poorly documented, despite the abundance of analogous modern shorelines. This paper presents the first facies analysis and stratigraphic-architectural characterization of the distal part of the Cretaceous lower Sego Sandstone (Book Cliffs, Colorado, U.S.A.), whose correlative proximal part is arguably the most comprehensively documented example of ancient deltaic strata that exhibit evidence for the activity of tides and waves. The distal lower Sego Sandstone consists of tide-dominated and wave-dominated deposits arranged within four regressive–transgressive tongues bounded by flooding surfaces. The proximal part of each regressive–transgressive tongue contains tide- dominated sandstones that sharply to erosionally overlie, and laterally interfinger with, wave-dominated deposits in the distal part of the tongue. Tide-dominated sandstones are fine to medium grained, and comprise wavy bedded and cross-bedded sandstones with abundant mud drapes, reactivation surfaces, and bidirectional, ebb- and flood-tide-directed paleocurrents. They define active tidal distributary channel-fill and nonchannelized tidal-bar deposits of similar lithologic character, which represent the proximal part of the delta front. Abandoned tidal distributary channel fills comprise intensely bioturbated mudstones. The outer, paleoseaward parts of tidal bars contain direct evidence for mixed tide and wave influence in the form of hummocky cross-stratified, very fine-grained sandstone beds intercalated with cross-bedded, fine- to medium-grained sandstones containing tidal indicators. These deposits locally pass paleoseaward into low-angle and hummocky cross-stratified sandstones with grain size and texture similar to tidal-bar deposits, implying reworking by storm waves. Wave-dominated deposits consist of coarsening-upward successions of mudstone and hummocky cross-stratified sandstone beds that represent the distal part of the delta front. Localized rhythmic variations in the wavelength of hummocky cross-stratification in some deposits may record tidal modulation of water depth and storm-wave velocities. These facies components and their architectural arrangement suggest that tides and waves operated together throughout deposition of the “lower Sego Delta,” but that tide-dominated and wave-dominated deposits were spatially partitioned into the proximal and distal parts of each regressive–transgressive tongue. Thus, tides and waves were effective in transporting and reworking sediment in different water-depth ranges and at different geographic locations. Mixed tide- and wave-influenced deposits are generally preserved only at the down-dip pinchout of regressive–transgressive tongues, because they are removed by tidal scour during delta progradation in more proximal locations. The spatial partitioning of time-equivalent tide-dominated and wave-dominated deposits is readily explained in a single depositional model, which requires the interpretation of neither sequence boundaries nor temporal changes in process regime across the sharp-to-erosional juxtaposition of tide-dominated sandstones above wave-dominated deposits in a regressive–transgressive tongue.

[1]  M. Gurnis,et al.  Dynamic versus flexural controls of Late Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, USA , 2014 .

[2]  Boyan K. Vakarelov,et al.  A hierarchical approach to architectural classification in marginal-marine systems: Bridging the gap between sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy , 2013 .

[3]  B. Carrapa,et al.  Sequence Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Sego Sandstone Member Reveals Spatio-Temporal Changes in Depositional Processes, Northwest Colorado, U.S.A. , 2013 .

[4]  J. A. Maceachern,et al.  Recognition of wave-dominated, tide-influenced shoreline systems in the rock record: Variations from a microtidal shoreline model , 2012 .

[5]  J. A. Maceachern,et al.  Tidal effects on the shoreface: Towards a conceptual framework , 2012 .

[6]  R. Steel,et al.  Anomalous clastic wedge development during the Sevier-Laramide transition, North American Cordilleran foreland basin, USA , 2011 .

[7]  D. Burton,et al.  Quantitative shale characterization of the tidally influenced Sego Sandstone , 2011 .

[8]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  Migration of dynamic subsidence across the Late Cretaceous United States Western Interior Basin in response to Farallon plate subduction , 2011 .

[9]  B. Carrapa,et al.  Sedimentological Characterization of the Sego Sandstone (NW Colorado, USA): A New Scheme to Recognize Ancient Flood-Tidal-Delta Deposits and Implications for Reservoir Potential , 2011 .

[10]  R. Steel,et al.  Anatomy and development of a low-accommodation clastic wedge, upper Cretaceous, Cordilleran Foreland Basin, USA , 2011 .

[11]  R. Nanson,et al.  Dynamic spatial and temporal prediction of changes in depositional processes on clastic shorelines: Toward improved subsurface uncertainty reduction and management , 2011 .

[12]  J. Macquaker,et al.  Wave-enhanced sediment-gravity flows and mud dispersal across continental shelves: Reappraising sediment transport processes operating in ancient mudstone successions , 2010 .

[13]  Kati Tänavsuu-Milkeviciene,et al.  Recognizing Tide-Dominated Versus Tide-Influenced Deltas: Middle Devonian Strata of the Baltic Basin , 2009 .

[14]  J. A. Maceachern,et al.  Tidally Modulated Shorefaces , 2009 .

[15]  P. Plink-Björklund,et al.  Regressive to transgressive transits reflected in tidal bars, Middle Devonian Baltic Basin , 2009 .

[16]  G. Hampson,et al.  Facies architecture of a net transgressive sandstone reservoir analog: The Cretaceous Hosta Tongue, New Mexico , 2008 .

[17]  P. Plink-Björklund,et al.  Depositional environments in an extensive tide‐influenced delta plain, Middle Devonian Gauja Formation, Devonian Baltic Basin , 2007 .

[18]  R. Dalrymple,et al.  Changes in Depositional Processes—An Ingredient in a New Generation of Sequence-Stratigraphic Models , 2007 .

[19]  Janok P. Bhattacharya,et al.  Basic Building Blocks and Process Variability of a Cretaceous Delta: Internal Facies Architecture Reveals a More Dynamic Interaction of River, Wave, and Tidal Processes Than Is Indicated by External Shape , 2007 .

[20]  R. Dalrymple,et al.  Morphologic and facies trends through the fluvial–marine transition in tide-dominated depositional systems: A schematic framework for environmental and sequence-stratigraphic interpretation , 2007 .

[21]  K. Campbell,et al.  The Paleoenvironmental Significance of Psilonichnus , 2006 .

[22]  John B. Southard,et al.  Experiments on Oscillatory-Flow and Combined-Flow Bed Forms: Implications for Interpreting Parts of the Shallow-Marine Sedimentary Record , 2005 .

[23]  G. Hampson,et al.  Mechanisms for Forming Discontinuity Surfaces Within Shoreface–shelf Parasequences: Sea Level, Sediment Supply, or Wave Regime? , 2005 .

[24]  R. D. Hettinger,et al.  Facies analysis and sequence stratigraphic framework of upper Campanian strata (Neslen and Mount Garfield formations, Bluecastle Tongue of the Castlegate sandstone, and Mancos shale), Eastern Book cliffs, Colorado and Utah , 2004 .

[25]  R. Martinsen.  Depositional remnants, part 2: Examples from the Western Interior Cretaceous basin of North America , 2003 .

[26]  B. Willis,et al.  Formation of Deep Incisions Into Tide-Dominated River Deltas: Implications for the Stratigraphy of the Sego Sandstone, Book Cliffs, Utah, U.S.A. , 2003 .

[27]  J. Muñoz,et al.  Low-amplitude, synsedimentary folding of a deltaic complex: Roda Sandstone (lower Eocene), South-Pyrenean Foreland Basin , 2003 .

[28]  K. Campbell,et al.  A NEW PSILONICHNUS ICHNOSPECIES ATTRIBUTED TO MUD–SHRIMP UPOGEBIA IN ESTUARINE SETTINGS , 2002 .

[29]  R. D. Hettinger,et al.  Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale (upper part) and Mesaverde Group in the southern part of the Uinta and Piceance basins, Utah and Colorado , 2002 .

[30]  B. Willis,et al.  Sharp‐based, tide‐dominated deltas of the Sego Sandstone, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA , 2001 .

[31]  R. Steel,et al.  Pinch‐out style and position of tidally influenced strata in a regressive–transgressive wave‐dominated deltaic sandbody, Twentymile Sandstone, Mesaverde Group, NW Colorado , 2001 .

[32]  J. Bhattacharya,et al.  Lowstand deltas in the Frontier Formation, Powder River basin, Wyoming: Implications for sequence stratigraphic models , 2001 .

[33]  A. Willis.  Tectonic control of nested sequence architecture in the Sego Sandstone, Neslen Formation and Upper Castlegate Sandstone (Upper Cretaceous), Sevier Foreland Basin, Utah, USA , 2000 .

[34]  R. Steel,et al.  Fourth-order nonmarine to marine sequences, middle Castlegate Formation, Book Cliffs, Utah , 2000 .

[35]  White,et al.  Architecture of a tide‐influenced river delta in the Frontier Formation of central Wyoming, USA , 1999 .

[36]  Christian Hübscher,et al.  The submarine delta of the Ganges–Brahmaputra: cyclone-dominated sedimentation patterns , 1998 .

[37]  G. P. Allen,et al.  Sedimentation in the modern and Miocene Mahakam delta , 1998 .

[38]  A. Prave,et al.  A depositional model for storm‐ and tide‐influenced prograding siliciclastic shorelines from the Middle Devonian of the central Appalachian foreland basin, USA , 1996 .

[39]  A. Miall,et al.  Tectonic control of nested sequence architecture in the Castlegate Sandstone (Upper Cretaceous), Book Cliffs, Utah , 1996 .

[40]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Fluid-mud processes on the Amazon continental shelf , 1996 .

[41]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  Paleogeography and the Late Cretaceous of the Western Interior of middle North America; coal distribution and sediment accumulation , 1995 .

[42]  R. Steel,et al.  Facies architecture and sequentiality of nearshore and ‘shelf’sandbodies; Haystack Mountains Formation, Wyoming, USA , 1995 .

[43]  S. Short,et al.  A preliminary study of sedimentation in the tidally dominated Fly River Delta, Gulf of Papua , 1993 .

[44]  Rudy Slingerland,et al.  Numerical simulations of tidal and wind-driven circulation in the Cretaceous Interior Seaway of North America , 1990 .

[45]  J. Wagoner,et al.  Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops , 1990 .

[46]  J. Pitman,et al.  Sedimentology, Mineralogy, Palynology, and Depositional History of Some Uppermost Cretaceous and Lowermost Tertiary Rocks Along the Utah Book and Roan Cliffs East of the Green River , 1990 .

[47]  K. J. Franczyk.  Depositional Controls on the Late Campanian Sego Sandstone and Implications for Associated Coal-Forming Environments in the Uinta and Piceance Basins , 1989 .

[48]  W. L. Duke.  Hummocky cross-stratification, tropical hurricanes, and intense winter storms , 1987 .

[49]  S. Pemberton,et al.  A Cretaceous woodground; the Teredolites ichnofacies , 1984 .

[50]  A. H. Stride.  Offshore Tidal Sands: Processes and deposits , 1982 .

[51]  R. Dott,et al.  Hummocky stratification: Significance of its variable bedding sequences , 1982 .

[52]  M. A. Johnson,et al.  The Tidal Origin of Some Vertical Sedimentary Changes in Epicontinental Seas , 1969, The Journal of Geology.

[53]  D. Fisher,et al.  Cretaceous and Tertiary formations of the Book Cliffs, Carbon, Emery, and Grand Counties, Utah, and Garfield and Mesa Counties, Colorado , 1960 .

[54]  R. G. Young.  SEDIMENTARY FACIES AND INTERTONGUING IN THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF THE BOOK CLIFFS, UTAH-COLORADO , 1955 .

[55]  D. Fisher.  The Book Cliffs coal field in Emery and Grand counties, Utah , 1936 .

[56]  Charles Edgar Erdmann,et al.  The Book Cliffs coal field in Garfield and Mesa counties, Colorado , 1934 .