The influence of forearm crutches on pelvic and hip kinematics in children with myelomeningocele: don't throw away the crutches

Gait analysis was performed on 16 children with high‐sacral‐level myelomeningocele who walked with and without crutches to evaluate the influence of crutches on their unique walking pattern. All of the patients used solid ankle‐foot orthoses (AFOs). Deviations in coronal and transverse planes improved with assisted walking. The timing of stance phase pelvic depression and the magnitude of stance phase hip abduction improved with crutch walking. Pelvic rotation, which was seven times the normal range of motion during no‐crutch walking, decreased to four times normal with crutches. Walking velocity was not significantly different between conditions. The results demonstrated that deviations in pelvic and hip kinematics are related to muscle weakness and improve with cratch use. Crutches enable the patient to transfer some weight bearing to their upper extremities which decreases the demand on weak lower‐extremity musculature. This allows them to maintain functional ambulation with a closer to normal gait pattern.

[1]  W J SHARRARD,et al.  THE SEGMENTAL INNERVATION OF THE LOWER LIMB MUSCLES IN MAN. , 1964, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[2]  Barson Aj The vertebral level of termination of the spinal cord during normal and abnormal development. , 1970 .

[3]  Charles C. Bonnett,et al.  Functional ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  N. Carroll,et al.  Ambulation of the braced myelomeningocele patient. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  M. Asher,et al.  Factors affecting the ambulatory status of patients with spina bifida cystica. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  M. Menelaus,et al.  Walking Ability in Mature Patients with Spina Bifida , 1983, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[7]  Morrison Jb,et al.  Kinematic symmetry of the lower limbs. , 1984 .

[8]  Ambulation in the adolescent with myelomeningocele. I: Early childhood predictors. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[10]  A L McDonough,et al.  Some biomechanical aspects of crutch and cane walking: the relationship between forward rate of progression, symmetry, and efficiency--a case report. , 1988, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[11]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  M. Menelaus,et al.  Neurologic status of spina bifida patients and the orthopedic surgeon. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  M G Hullin,et al.  Ankle‐Foot Orthosis Function in Low‐Level Myelomeningocele , 1992, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[14]  John J. Williams,et al.  Late Knee Problems in Myelomeningocele , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[15]  J. Rice,et al.  Myelomeningocele at the sacral level. Long-term outcomes in adults. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  John F. Sarwark,et al.  Characteristic pelvic, hip, and knee kinematic patterns in children with lumbosacral myelomeningocele , 1994 .

[17]  L. Dias,et al.  Valgus stress at the knee joint in lumbo-sacral myelomeningocele: A gait analysis evaluation , 1995 .