Controlling the optical properties of single molecules by optical confinement in a tunable microcavity

Optical microcavities are structures which confine light to a small region in the range of one wavelength. The radiation of a quantum emitter is coupled to cavity resonances which leads to an optical confinement of the broadband fluorescence [Fig. 1a, b]. A practical design for this single-mode microcavity is formed by two silver mirrors enclosing a transparent dielectric medium with single quantum emitters. Steiner et al. have shown that the fluorescence spectra and decay lifetimes of single molecules in this Fabry-Perot type microcavity are strongly dependent on the resonator length [1].

[1]  Sébastien Peter,et al.  Optical microresonator modifies the efficiency of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer in the autofluorescent protein DsRed , 2009, BiOS.

[2]  S. Hell.  Toward fluorescence nanoscopy , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  W. Lukosz.  Light emission by magnetic and electric dipoles close to a plane dielectric interface. III. Radiation patterns of dipoles with arbitrary orientation , 1979 .

[4]  T G Brown,et al.  Longitudinal field modes probed by single molecules. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[5]  Jörg Enderlein,et al.  Spectral properties of a fluorescing molecule within a spherical metallic nanocavityPresented at the LANMAT 2001 Conference on the Interaction of Laser Radiation with Matter at Nanoscopic Scales: From Single Molecule Spectroscopy to Materials Processing, Venice, 3–6 October, 2001. , 2002 .

[6]  G Leuchs,et al.  Sharper focus for a radially polarized light beam. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[7]  J. Enderlein,et al.  Tight focusing of laser beams in a λ/2-microcavity , 2008 .

[8]  E. Purcell.  Spontaneous Emission Probabilities at Radio Frequencies , 1995 .

[9]  K. Vasilev,et al.  Surface-plasmon-mediated single-molecule fluorescence through a thin metallic film. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[10]  S W Hell,et al.  Coherent use of opposing lenses for axial resolution increase in fluorescence microscopy. I. Comparative study of concepts. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  W. Lukosz,et al.  Optical-environment-dependent effects on the fluorescence of submonomolecular dye layers on interfaces , 1987 .

[12]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[13]  S. Hell,et al.  4Pi‐confocal images with axial superresolution , 1996 .

[14]  K. Drexhage,et al.  IV Interaction of Light with Monomolecular Dye Layers , 1974 .

[15]  J. Enderlein,et al.  Tuning the fluorescence emission spectra of a single molecule with a variable optical subwavelength metal microcavity. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[16]  Alfred J. Meixner,et al.  Longitudinal localization of a fluorescent bead in a tunable microcavity with an accuracy of λ/60 , 2009 .

[17]  E. H. Linfoot.  Principles of Optics , 1961 .

[18]  F. Schleifenbaum,et al.  Controlling molecular broadband-emission by optical confinement , 2008 .

[19]  S. Hell.  Far-field optical nanoscopy , 2010 .

[20]  F. Schleifenbaum,et al.  Microcavity-controlled single-molecule fluorescence. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.