The current state of welfare, housing and husbandry of the English pet rabbit population

BackgroundThe welfare of pet rabbits is an area of growing interest in Europe and the UK. This study analyses questionnaire results from a diverse population of 1254 rabbit owners from three different geographical areas in England with the aim of providing an accurate representation of how pet rabbits are currently housed and cared for and key aspects of their health and welfare.ResultsRabbits were kept in a variety of different housing types, the most common being a traditional hutch/cage (59%). Although the majority had additional exercise areas, access was often unpredictable, or ill-timed, which may compromise welfare. Only 41.9% of owners kept their rabbit with conspecifics, limiting their ability to engage in social behaviour. Of those rabbits housed with a companion, although many were reported to be amicable and to engage in positive interactions, over a quarter were reported to fight at least occasionally (25.3%), whilst 22.7% guarded resources and 27.1% avoided one another. Whilst low levels of some of these behaviours may be a normal part of social interaction, the relatively high levels reported here suggest that not all cohabiting pairs of rabbits are compatible, which is potentially a significant welfare issue.Although the vast majority of owners fed hay for over 10% this was less than daily. Pelleted foods were very popular (71.4% at least daily) compared to commercial muesli mixes (32.6%). As in previous studies, dental problems were commonly reported (12.2% of rabbits); however, so were eye problems (12.9%), digestive problems (11.5%) and parasites (11.3%). A large proportion of rabbits (58%) were thought to be fearful of loud noises, and 61% were not reported as calm when handled by their owner, which may be a significant concern for this species.ConclusionThis study has confirmed and expanded on previous findings: many pet rabbits were found to be in good health, had compatible companions and were provided with enriched living areas. However, it also found numerous welfare issues that affect large numbers of pet rabbits. We suggest further studies are required exploring the accuracy of owner reports (which possibly under-report many problems) and prioritising the issues raised here.

[1]  A. Meredith,et al.  Food and water intake and selective feeding in rabbits on four feeding regimes. , 2014, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[2]  R. J. Turner,et al.  Choices of laboratory rabbits for individual or group-housing , 1995 .

[3]  A. Trocino,et al.  Effect of handling in pre-weaning rabbits. , 2012 .

[4]  M. Špinka,et al.  Animal play and animal welfare , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  H. Würbel,et al.  Regrouping rabbit does in a familiar or novel pen: Effects on agonistic behaviour, injuries and core body temperature , 2011 .

[6]  P. Koene,et al.  Welfare assessment in pet rabbits , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[7]  L. Lidfors Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits , 1997 .

[8]  D. Main,et al.  Behaviour and personality of pet rabbits and their interactions with their owners , 2007, Veterinary Record.

[9]  Z. Gerencsér,et al.  Effect of cage height on the welfare of growing rabbits , 2008 .

[10]  K. Carlstead,et al.  Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats , 1993 .

[11]  D. Main,et al.  Survey of the husbandry, health and welfare of 102 pet rabbits , 2006, Veterinary Record.

[12]  A. Meriggi,et al.  DENSITY AND HABITAT USE BY THE EUROPEAN WILD RABBIT (ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS) IN AN AGRICULTURAL AREA OF NORTHERN ITALY , 2009 .

[13]  I. Sayers Approach to preventive health care and welfare in rabbits , 2010, In Practice.

[14]  Berthelsen,et al.  The effect of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of caged rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[15]  G. González-Mariscal,et al.  Scent marking by the male domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is stimulated by an object's novelty and its specific visual or tactile characteristics , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  B. Jilge The rabbit: a diurnal or a nocturnal animal? , 1991, Journal of experimental animal science.

[17]  R. Mykytowycz,et al.  Aggressive and protective behaviour of adult rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) towards juveniles. , 1972, Behaviour.

[18]  J. Rushen,et al.  Assessing the welfare of dairy calves: outcome-based measures of calf health versus input-based measures of the use of risky management practices , 2012 .

[19]  J. Cooper,et al.  The effects of spatial restriction on the behavior of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) , 2010 .

[20]  S. Mullan,et al.  Knowledge and attitudes of 52 UK pet rabbit owners at the point of sale , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[21]  V. Jekl,et al.  Rabbit dental disease and calcium metabolism--the science behind divided opinions. , 2013, The Journal of small animal practice.

[22]  Georgia Mason,et al.  Animal economics: assessing the motivation of female laboratory rabbits to reach a platform, social contact and food , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  D. L. Brooks,et al.  Response of adult New Zealand white rabbits to enrichment objects and paired housing. , 1991, Laboratory animal science.