Seismic tests of beam-to-column connections in a precast concrete frame

Two full-scale beam-to-column connections in a precast concrete frame were tested under uni-directional and bi-directional cyclic loading that simulated earthquake-type motions. Variables included the detailing used at the joint to achieve structural continuity of the beam reinforcement, and the type of framing (whether two-dimensional or three-dimensional). The most relevant feature of the connection is that conventional mild steel reinforcing bars or prestressing strands, rather than welding or special bolts, were used to achieve beam continuity. Specimen design followed the strong-column-weak-beam concept. Beam reinforcement was purposely designed and detailed to develop hinges at the joint faces and to impose large inelastic shear force demands into the joint. During specimen fabrication, the joint details enabled ease and speed of construction. As expected, the joint controlled the specimen failure. In general, the performance of both beam-to-column connections was satisfactory. Joint strength was 80 percent of that expected for monolithic reinforced concrete construction. Specimen behavior was ductile due to hoop yielding and bar pullout, while strength was nearly constant up to drifts of 3.5 percent.

[1]  Robert E. Englekirk,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND TESTINGS OF A DUCTILE CONNECTOR FOR ASSEMBLING PRECAST CONCRETE BEAMS AND COLUMNS , 1995 .

[2]  Robert Park,et al.  Design of connections of earthquake resisting precast reinforced concrete perimeter frames , 1995 .

[3]  John F. Stanton,et al.  An Overview of the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Test Building , 1999 .

[4]  G. Cheok,et al.  Performance of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Subject to Cyclic Loading , 1991 .

[5]  Robert E. Englekirk Seismic Design Considerations for Precast Concrete Multistory Buildings , 1990 .

[6]  H. S. Lew,et al.  Model Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Subject to Cyclic Loading , 1993 .

[7]  S. K. Ghosh,et al.  Precast Structures in Regions of High Seismicity: 1997 UBC Design Provisions , 1997 .

[8]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Tests on Connections of Earthquake Resisting Precast Reinforced Concrete Perimeter Frames of Buildings , 1995 .

[9]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons , 1996 .

[10]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  The PRESSS program : Current status and proposed plans for phase III , 1996 .

[11]  Halûk Sucuoğlu,et al.  EFFECT OF CONNECTION RIGIDITY ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PRECAST CONCRETE FRAMES , 1995 .

[12]  Robert Park,et al.  A perspective on the seismic design opf precast concrete structures in New Zealand , 1995 .

[13]  Catherine E French,et al.  Ductile Connections for Precast Concrete Frame Systems , 1993 .