Somatic alterations of TP53 and MDM2 associated with response to enfortumab vedotin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

Background Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for patients with treatment-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), however data on biomarkers of response is lacking. Methods We retrospectively identified all aUC patients at our institution who received EV monotherapy and had next-generation sequencing (NGS) data available. Patients were considered responders if they had a complete response or partial response on restaging scans during treatment. Observed response rate (ORR) was evaluated by local investigator and compared between responders and non-responders using Chi-squared test. A univariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard test to assess for associations between baseline characteristics and most common somatic alterations (in ≥10% of patients) with patient survival outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. Somatic alterations were then individually evaluated in separate multivariate models while accounting for patient and clinical characteristics using Cox regression models. Results Among 29 patients treated with EV monotherapy, 27 had available NGS data. Median age was 70, 24 (83%) were men, 19 (62%) were Caucasian, 15 (52%) had pure urothelial histology and 22 (76%) had primary tumor in the bladder. ORR was 41%, and PFS and OS for the overall cohort were 5.1 months and 10.2 months. Responders were enriched among patients with TP53, KDM6A and MDM2 alterations. Patients with these alterations, as well as those with composite TP53/MDM2 alterations (alterations in either TP53 or MDM2), also had increased ORR with EV treatment compared to patients without these alterations. In the univariable analysis, baseline albumin level ≥ 3.0g/dL and presence of composite TP53/MDM2 alterations were associated with a prolonged OS. Baseline ECOG 0/1, TP53 alterations and TP53/MDM2 alterations were associated with a prolonged PFS. In the multivariable analysis, TP53 and TP53/MDM2 alterations were genomic markers predictive of improved PFS after accounting for the relevant clinical characteristics. Conclusion In this single-center retrospective analysis of aUC patients treated with EV, presence of TP53 or MDM2 somatic alterations, lower ECOG PS scores (ECOG 0 or 1) and higher albumin levels (≥3 g/dL) were associated with improved outcomes with EV treatment. Prospective and external validation of these findings in larger cohorts is warranted.

[1]  G. Kristiansen,et al.  Membranous NECTIN-4 Expression Frequently Decreases during Metastatic Spread of Urothelial Carcinoma and Is Associated with Enfortumab Vedotin Resistance , 2022, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  Xinyu Zheng,et al.  A multicentre single arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib and letrozole plus dalpiciclib for triple-positive breast cancer , 2022, Nature Communications.

[3]  N. Agarwal,et al.  Genomic and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. , 2022, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[4]  M. Milowsky,et al.  Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer , 2022, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Sweet-Cordero,et al.  APOBEC Mutational Signature and Tumor Mutational Burden as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[6]  G. Sonpavde,et al.  Phase Ib trial of erdafitinib (E) combined with enfortumab vedotin (EV) following platinum and PD-1/L1 inhibitors for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with FGFR2/3 genetic alterations (GAs). , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  S. Srinivas,et al.  Study EV-103 cohort L: Evaluating perioperative enfortumab vedotin monotherapy in cis-ineligible muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) (trial in progress). , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  G. Sonpavde,et al.  Association of changes in albumin levels with survival and toxicities in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving enfortumab vedotin (EV). , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  G. Sonpavde,et al.  Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) progressing on platinum-based chemotherapy and PD1/L1 inhibitors (ICB): Double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial. , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Porta,et al.  A phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter, global study of the efficacy and safety of durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + enfortumab vedotin (EV) or D + EV for neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) (VOLGA). , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Srinivas,et al.  Study EV-103 Cohort H: Antitumor activity of neoadjuvant treatment with enfortumab vedotin monotherapy in patients (pts) with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are cisplatin-ineligible. , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  T. Powles,et al.  Clinico-genomic characterization of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma in real-world practice and development of a novel bladder immune prognostic index (BIPI). , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  G. Sonpavde,et al.  Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin in advanced urothelial cancer: Analysis from the Urothelial Cancer Network to Investigate Therapeutic Experiences (UNITE) study , 2021, Cancer.

[14]  J. Ajani,et al.  9p21 loss confers a cold tumor immune microenvironment and primary resistance to immune checkpoint therapy , 2021, Nature Communications.

[15]  P. Hegde,et al.  Molecular determinants of response to PD-L1 blockade across tumor types , 2021, Nature Communications.

[16]  M. Meng,et al.  Heterogeneity in NECTIN4 Expression Across Molecular Subtypes of Urothelial Cancer Mediates Sensitivity to Enfortumab Vedotin , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  J. Witjes,et al.  Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  T. Choueiri,et al.  CDKN2A Alterations and Response to Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  D. Bajorin,et al.  Pembrolizumab monotherapy for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to BCG (KEYNOTE-057): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  M. Galsky,et al.  KEYNOTE-B15/EV-304: Randomized phase 3 study of perioperative enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). , 2021 .

[21]  E. Small,et al.  TERT promoter mutations and other prognostic factors in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor , 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[22]  N. Agarwal,et al.  TROPHY-U-01: A Phase II Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Progressing After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Checkpoint Inhibitors , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  T. Powles,et al.  Enfortumab Vedotin in Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  N. Agarwal,et al.  A New Prognostic Model in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. , 2021, European urology oncology.

[25]  Craig B. Davis,et al.  Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  David C. Smith,et al.  EV-101: A Phase I Study of Single-Agent Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Nectin-4–Positive Solid Tumors, Including Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Guangzhen Wu,et al.  Significance of TP53 mutation in bladder cancer disease progression and drug selection , 2019, PeerJ.

[28]  M. Galsky,et al.  Pivotal Trial of Enfortumab Vedotin in Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum and Anti-Programmed Death 1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 Therapy , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  R. Huddart,et al.  Erdafitinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  L. Bubendorf,et al.  Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: A Step Closer to Clinical Translation? , 2017, European urology.

[32]  T. Powles,et al.  First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[33]  Scott W. Lowe,et al.  Putting p53 in Context , 2017, Cell.

[34]  E. Plimack,et al.  Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  S. Culine,et al.  Pembrolizumab as Second‐Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Mutant p53: Multiple Mechanisms Define Biologic Activity in Cancer , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[37]  The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[38]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[39]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[40]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[41]  Wei Gu,et al.  Dual Roles of MDM2 in the Regulation of p53: Ubiquitination Dependent and Ubiquitination Independent Mechanisms of MDM2 Repression of p53 Activity. , 2012, Genes & cancer.

[42]  S. Culine,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  Sudhir Srivastava,et al.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  Stephen N. Jones,et al.  Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2 , 1997, Nature.

[45]  M. Oren,et al.  Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53 , 1997, Nature.