Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops.

Environmental risk assessments can provide high confidence of minimal risk by testing theories, "risk hypotheses", that predict the likelihood of unacceptable harmful events. The creation of risk hypotheses and a plan to test them is called problem formulation. Effective problem formulation seeks to maximize the possibility of detecting effects that indicate potential risk; if such effects are not detected, minimal risk is indicated with high confidence. Two important implications are that artificial test conditions can increase confidence, whereas prescriptive data requirements can reduce confidence (increase uncertainty) if they constrain problem formulation. Poor problem formulation can increase environmental risk because it leads to the collection of superfluous data that may delay or prevent the introduction of environmentally beneficial products.

[1]  Glenn W. II Suter,et al.  Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessments , 1990 .

[2]  Esther J Kok,et al.  Substantial equivalence--an appropriate paradigm for the safety assessment of genetically modified foods? , 2002, Toxicology.

[3]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[4]  R. Howard.  The Economic Impact , 1982 .

[5]  M. Power,et al.  Perspectives of the Scientific Community on the Status of Ecological Risk Assessment , 1997 .

[6]  R. K. Peterson,et al.  Agricultural biotechnology and societal decision-making: the role of risk analysis , 2000 .

[7]  Marcel Dicke,et al.  Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[8]  Clive James,et al.  Global review of commercialized transgenic crops , 2003 .

[9]  L. Touart,et al.  INFORMATION NEEDS FOR PESTICIDE REGISTRATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 1997 .

[10]  Mike Mendelsohn,et al.  Are Bt crops safe? , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  A. Raybould,et al.  A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms. , 2006, Environmental biosafety research.

[12]  Alan Raybould,et al.  Tiered tests to assess the environmental risk of fitness changes in hybrids between transgenic crops and wild relatives: the example of virus resistant Brassica napus. , 2005, Environmental biosafety research.

[13]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature , 2005, Science.

[14]  Steven E. Naranjo,et al.  Field Studies Assessing Arthropod Nontarget Effects in Bt Transgenic Crops: Introduction , 2005 .

[15]  N. Crickmore,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[16]  A. Raybould,et al.  Assssing the Environmental Risks of Gene Flow from GM Crops to Wild Relatives , 2007 .

[17]  Jörg Romeis,et al.  Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  M. Hudson,et al.  How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis? , 2007, Trends in plant science.

[19]  A. Gray.  Ecology and government policies: the GM crop debate* , 2004 .

[20]  ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT: TASKS AND OBLIGATIONS , 1998 .

[21]  J. Giles.  Biosafety trials darken outlook for transgenic crops in Europe , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  A Critique for Ecology , 1991 .

[23]  Henry I. Miller,et al.  The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution , 2004 .

[24]  David A. Bohan,et al.  On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  M. Koziel,et al.  Vip3A, a novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of activities against lepidopteran insects. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  The Economic Impact of Bt Corn Resulting from Mycotoxin Reduction , 2004 .

[27]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[28]  Ryan A Hill,et al.  General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.

[29]  A. Blechl,et al.  Engineering deoxynivalenol metabolism in wheat through the expression of a fungal trichothecene acetyltransferase gene , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[30]  Richard L. Hellmich,et al.  Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.