Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening

Abstract The mapping of phonetic information to lexical representations in second-language (L2) listening was examined using an eyetracking paradigm. Japanese listeners followed instructions in English to click on pictures in a display. When instructed to click on a picture of a rocket, they experienced interference when a picture of a locker was present, that is, they tended to look at the locker instead. However, when instructed to click on the locker, they were unlikely to look at the rocket. This asymmetry is consistent with a similar asymmetry previously observed in Dutch listeners’ mapping of English vowel contrasts to lexical representations. The results suggest that L2 listeners may maintain a distinction between two phonetic categories of the L2 in their lexical representations, even though their phonetic processing is incapable of delivering the perceptual discrimination required for correct mapping to the lexical distinction. At the phonetic processing level, one of the L2 categories is dominant; the present results suggest that dominance is determined by acoustic–phonetic proximity to the nearest L1 category. At the lexical processing level, representations containing this dominant category are more likely than representations containing the non-dominant category to be correctly contacted by the phonetic input.

[1]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Do the Beginnings of Spoken Words Have a Special Status in Auditory Word Recognition , 1993 .

[3]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[4]  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996 .

[5]  N. Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  The Influence of Initial Exposure on Lexical Representation: Comparing Early and Simultaneous Bilinguals. , 2005 .

[6]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  R. Smits,et al.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[11]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition , 2001 .

[12]  W. Strange Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[13]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[14]  A. Weber,et al.  Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition , 2004 .

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Tsuneo Yamada,et al.  Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/ , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[17]  C. Pallier,et al.  The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries , 2001, Psychological science.

[18]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[20]  H. Goto,et al.  Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[22]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Comprehension of non-native speech: inaccurate phoneme processing and activation of lexical competitors , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[23]  N. Takagi Signal detection modeling of Japanese listeners' /r/-/l/ labeling behavior in one-interval identification task. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Linguistic experience and the "perceptual magnet effect." , 1995 .

[25]  A. Cutler,et al.  Pseudo‐homophony in non‐native listening , 2004 .

[26]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.