Evaluating the correlation between film mammography and MRI for screening women with increased breast cancer risk.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being added to mammography for screening asymptomatic women at increased risk of breast cancer. Because the direction and extent of correlation between mammography and MRI could potentially result in over- or underestimation of the diagnostic gain related to using MRI as an adjunct to mammographic screening, we performed an analysis to evaluate the extent of correlation between mammography and MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the published literature to identify multimodality breast cancer screening studies reporting the sensitivity of mammography and MRI, alone and in combination, for breast cancer diagnosis. After calculating the expected sensitivity of combined mammography and MRI under conditions of test independence (no correlation), we compared the calculated and observed sensitivities for combined mammography and MRI. We then calculated correlation coefficients for mammography and MRI. RESULTS Seven studies of multimodality screening in women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were included for analysis. Of these studies, the correlation between film mammography and MRI was positive in three studies, negative in two studies, and not identified in two studies. The calculated correlation coefficients ranged from -0.38 to 0.18. In six of seven studies, the 95% confidence interval for the correlation coefficient included 0.0, indicating no significant correlation. CONCLUSIONS Evidence from published trials of multimodality breast cancer screening identified no statistically significant correlation between film mammography and MRI. Using both tests for breast cancer screening is likely to improve the early detection of breast cancer in women at increased risk.

[1]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[2]  J C Hershey,et al.  Using multiple tests: series and parallel approaches. , 1982, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[3]  M Zelen,et al.  Testing the Independence of Two Diagnostic Tests , 2001, Biometrics.

[4]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[6]  Kjell Arne Kvistad,et al.  Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series. , 2007, Breast.

[7]  J. Satagopan,et al.  Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  R. Riffenburgh.  Chapter 24 – Regression and Correlation Methods , 2006 .

[10]  A. Mushlin,et al.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. , 2007, Radiology.

[13]  P. Bult,et al.  The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[15]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[16]  R. Marshall,et al.  The Predictive Value of Simple Rules for Combining Two Diagnostic Tests , 1989 .

[17]  J. Klijn,et al.  Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  J. Goldblatt,et al.  Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: An Australian feasibility study , 2008, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[19]  M. El-Tamer,et al.  The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations , 2004, Cancer.

[20]  Francesco Sardanelli,et al.  Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection? , 2007, European Radiology.

[21]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[22]  T. Helbich,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Improves Detection of Invasive Cancer, Preinvasive Cancer, and Premalignant Lesions during Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. , 2007, Radiology.

[24]  F. Podo,et al.  MRI in the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Women with High Genetic Risk , 2006, Tumori.

[25]  J. Klijn,et al.  Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.