Application issues for large-area electrochromic windows in commercial buildings

Projections of performance from small-area devices to large-area windows and enterprise marketing have created high expectations for electrochromic glazings. As a result, this paper seeks to precipitate an objective dialog between material scientists and building-application scientists to determine whether actual large-area electrochromic devices will result in significant performance benefits and what material improvements are needed, if any, to make electrochromics more practical for commercial building applications. Few in situ tests have been conducted with large-area electrochromic windows applied in buildings. This study presents monitored results from a full-scale field test of large-area electrochromic windows to illustrate how this technology will perform in commercial buildings. The visible transmittance (Tv) of the installed electrochromic ranged from 0.11 to 0.38. The data are limited to the winter period for a south-east-facing window. The effect of actual device performance on lighting energy use, direct sun control, discomfort glare, and interior illumination is discussed. No mechanical system loads were monitored. These data demonstrate the use of electrochromics in a moderate climate and focus on the most restrictive visual task: computer use in offices. Through this small demonstration, we were able to determine that electrochromic windows can indeed provide unmitigated transparent views and a level of dynamic illumination control never before seen in architectural glazing materials. Daily lighting energy use was 6–24% less compared to the 11%-glazing, with improved interior brightness levels. Daily lighting energy use was 3% less to 13% more compared to the 38%-glazing, with improved window brightness control. The electrochromic window may not be able to fulfill both energy-efficiency and visual comfort objectives when low winter direct sun is present, particularly for computer tasks using cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays. However, window and architectural design as well as electrochromic control options are suggested as methods to broaden the applicability of electrochromics for commercial buildings. Without further modification, its applicability is expected to be limited during cold winter periods due to its slow switching speed.

[1]  Junichi Nagai,et al.  Durability evaluation of electrochromic devices – an industry perspective , 1999 .

[2]  Robert Kostecki,et al.  Switchable mirrors based on nickel–magnesium films , 2001 .

[3]  Claes G. Granqvist,et al.  Handbook of inorganic electrochromic materials , 1995 .

[4]  Robert B. Sargent,et al.  Large area electrochromics for architectural applications , 1997 .

[5]  G. Roessler.  The psychological function of windows for the visual communication between the interior of rooms with permanent supplementary artificial lighting and the exterior , 1980 .

[6]  David K. Benson,et al.  Durability issues and service lifetime prediction of electrochromic windows for buildings applications , 1999 .

[7]  Kuo-Chuan Ho,et al.  The influence of charge capacity ratio on the performance of a complementary electrochromic system , 1999 .

[8]  John M. Bell,et al.  Kinetics of charge injection in sol–gel deposited WO3 , 1999 .

[9]  K. Urbanik,et al.  Progress toward durable, cost effective electrochromic window glazings , 1999 .

[10]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[11]  Jean-Paul Randin.  Response time of large-scale electrochromic devices , 1990, Other Conferences.

[12]  S. E. Selkowitz,et al.  Visual quality assessment of electrochromic and conventional glazings , 1996 .

[13]  Zhang Hui,et al.  An improved multinode model of human physiology and thermal comfort , 1999 .

[14]  E. S. Lee.  Integrated performance of an automated venetian blind/electric lighting system in a full-scale private office , 1998 .

[15]  Kit Cuttle,et al.  Subjective assessments of the appearance of special performance glazing in offices , 1979 .

[16]  Boris Orel,et al.  Comparative studies of “all sol–gel” electrochromic devices with optically passive counter-electrode films, ormolyte Li+ ion-conductor and WO3 or Nb2O5 electrochromic films , 1999 .

[17]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[18]  I. L. Bailey,et al.  Large area glare sources and their effect on visual discomfort and visual performance at computer workstations , 1992, Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[19]  F. Simone,et al.  Preliminary test of a large electrochromic window , 1999 .

[20]  Takaya Kubo,et al.  Thermal and optical behavior of electrochromic windows fabricated with carbon-based counterelectrode , 1999 .

[21]  E. Tronci,et al.  1996 , 1997, Affair of the Heart.

[22]  R. Webb,et al.  A theoretical model for prediction of the heat load in flooded refrigerant evaporators , 1989 .

[23]  Claes-Göran Granqvist,et al.  Electrochromic tungsten oxide films: Review of progress 1993–1998 , 2000 .

[24]  R. David Rauh,et al.  Electrochromic windows: an overview , 1999 .

[25]  D. C. Pritchard.  The Lighting of Buildings , 1970 .

[26]  John M. Bell,et al.  Failure modes of sol–gel deposited electrochromic devices , 1999 .

[27]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[28]  J. E. Flynn.  IES adopts new lighting recommendations. [Illuminating Engineering Society of North America] , 1980 .

[29]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Review of electrochromic window performance factors , 1994, Other Conferences.

[30]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Effect of switching control strategies on the energy performance of electrochromic windows , 1994, Other Conferences.