An empirical investigation of consumer control factors on intention to use selected self‐service technologies

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to build on prior work to empirically test the possible effects of control‐related consumer difference variables on the decision to use self‐service technology (SSTs) in three different contexts. Specifically, the paper seeks to examine potential effects of locus of control, autonomy, self‐efficacy, technology anxiety and time pressure on the SST usage decision in a shopping, a library and a hotel situation.Design/methodology/approach – The design of the study was empirical. Data for the study came from 187 college students in classes from four different departments (business, computer science, language, and music departments) in a southern regional university.Findings – Overall, the results suggest that regardless of individual need for control and achievements, highly techno phobic consumers and those with an enduring attitude that all events in life are predestined may be generally more disposed than others to prefer check‐out service personnel rather than self‐se...

[1]  O. Doronina.  Fear of Computers: Its Nature, Prevention, and Cure , 1995 .

[2]  Lance A. Bettencourt,et al.  The relationship between waiting in a service queue and evaluations of service quality: A field theory perspective , 1998 .

[3]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  The Influence of Individualism, Collectivism, and Locus of Control on Environmental Beliefs and Behavior , 2001 .

[4]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[5]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters , 2000 .

[6]  Agnés Durrande-Moreau,et al.  Waiting for service: ten years of empirical research , 1999 .

[7]  C. Kaufman,et al.  Exploring More Than 24 Hours a Day: A Preliminary Investigation of Polychronic Time Use , 1991 .

[8]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies , 2003 .

[9]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance , 1993 .

[10]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Time and Organizations , 1988 .

[11]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  Effects of Trait Competitiveness and Perceived Intraorganizational Competition on Salesperson Goal Setting and Performance , 1998 .

[12]  Toru Sato.  Sociotropy and Autonomy: The Nature of Vulnerability , 2003, The Journal of psychology.

[13]  Gary Davies,et al.  A Time Attitude Scale for Cross Cultural Research , 2002 .

[14]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model , 2004 .

[15]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[16]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[17]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  Locus of Control, Web use, and Consumer Attitudes toward Internet Regulation , 2003 .

[18]  M. Holbrook.  B, Hirschman, Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and Fun, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol pg 132 , 1982 .

[19]  O. Ferrell,et al.  The management of customer-contact service employees: An empirical investigation. , 1996 .

[20]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[21]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[22]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[23]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[24]  P. A. Dabholkar.  Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality , 1996 .

[25]  David A. Brenders.  Perceived Control: Foundations and Directions for Communication Research , 1987 .

[26]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[27]  Jung-ki Lee,et al.  Effects of personal control on adoption of self‐service technology innovations , 2002 .

[28]  L. Larson,et al.  Significant predictors of problem-solving appraisal. , 1990 .

[29]  S. Gully,et al.  Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal--setting process. , 1997 .

[30]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  The effects of locational convenience on customer repurchase intentions across service types , 2003 .

[32]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy. I: V. S. Ramachandran (red.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (vol. s. ). New York: Academic Press. , 1994 .

[33]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[34]  Jacob Hornik,et al.  The Use of Time: An Integrated Conceptual Model , 1981 .

[35]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers , 1989 .

[36]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A MULTIPLE-ITEM SCALE FOR MEASURING CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY , 1988 .

[37]  A. Beck,et al.  The Sociotropy–Autonomy Scale: Structure and Implications , 2000, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[38]  H. Levenson.  Activism and Powerful Others: Distinctions within the Concept of Internal-External Control , 1974 .

[39]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[40]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons , 2005 .

[41]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..