Temporal learning curve of a multidisciplinary team for magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy
暂无分享,去创建一个
H. Kang | P. Troncoso | Haesun Choi | W. Qiao | J. Gregg | M. Altok | A. Urkmez | Irene Inguillo | J. Ward | H. Demirel
[1] A. Rosenkrantz,et al. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging‐Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years , 2018, The Journal of urology.
[2] D. Margolis,et al. MRI‐Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate‐Cancer Diagnosis , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.
[3] P Choyke,et al. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve , 2017, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.
[4] Tristan Barrett,et al. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI‐transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion‐guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool , 2016, BJU international.
[5] Leonard S Marks,et al. Target detection: magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy. , 2014, Urologic oncology.
[6] D. Hawkes,et al. The accuracy of different biopsy strategies for the detection of clinically important prostate cancer: a computer simulation. , 2012, The Journal of urology.
[7] S. Fosså,et al. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population‐based study , 2009, BJU international.