Behavior Change Techniques and Physical Activity Using the Fitbit Flex

The availability of low-cost accelerometer technology has led to a surge in consumer-based physical activity monitors (Lee et al., 2014). A top leader in this market is Fitbit (Dolan, 2014). Fitbit's activity tracking devices allow for self-monitoring and other features related to behaviour change (e.g., goal setting) called behaviour change techniques (BCTs). It has been determined that one popular wrist-worn device, the Fitbit Flex®, incorporates 20 BCTs (Lyons et al., 2014). The purpose of this study was to explore user's experience with the Fitbit Flex® as it relates to physical activity behaviour and BCTs. Participants (n=28, 82.1% female, 18-71 years old) completed an online survey assessing: (1) demographics and Fitbit acquisition, (2) step volume (number of steps for the past week and the first week of use), and (3) user's perceived importance and/or frequency of use of the 20 BCTs. Participants had used the Fitbit for an average 5 months and there was a significant increase of almost 2000 steps (p = .003) from the first to the past week of use. The BCTs rated among the highest for perceived importance for physical activity behaviour (i.e., step volume) were feedback, self-monitoring, and goal setting. The BCTs related to feedback or reward of outcomes (i.e., weight loss) and social features (e.g., social support) were rated on the lower end of importance/frequency. Overall, the present study contributes to understanding the influence wearing a Fitbit Flex has on physical activity as well as the importance of certain BCTs, which has implications for future physical activity promotion and product development.

[1]  Susan Michie,et al.  Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change , 2012 .

[2]  F. Sniehotta,et al.  Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories , 2016, Health psychology review.

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[4]  M. Hassenzahl,et al.  Wellbeing in the Making: Peoples’ Experiences with Wearable Activity Trackers , 2016, Psychology of well-being.

[5]  C. Abraham,et al.  Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[6]  Matthew R. Bice,et al.  Technology and physical activity motivation , 2016 .

[7]  Elizabeth J Lyons,et al.  Behavior Change Techniques Implemented in Electronic Lifestyle Activity Monitors: A Systematic Content Analysis , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[10]  R. Shaw,et al.  The Impact of Interventions that Integrate Accelerometers on Physical Activity and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review , 2017, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  J. Spence,et al.  How many steps/day are enough? for adults , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[12]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Why Do Pedometers Work? , 2009, Sports medicine.

[13]  C. Craig,et al.  Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. , 2011, Health reports.

[14]  M. Lachman,et al.  Behavior Change with Fitness Technology in Sedentary Adults: A Review of the Evidence for Increasing Physical Activity , 2017, Front. Public Health.

[15]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[16]  M. Sexton,et al.  Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel technology-based intervention to support physical activity in cancer survivors , 2017, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[17]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness , 2014, CHI.

[18]  R. Furberg,et al.  Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.