Effect of Selected Insecticides on the Natural Enemies Coleomegilla maculata and Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Geocoris punctipes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), and Bracon mellitor, Cardiochiles nigriceps, and Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Cotton

Abstract We evaluated the toxicity of three insecticides (lambdacyhalothrin, spinosad, and S-1812) to the natural enemies Braconmellitor Say, Cardiochiles nigriceps Viereck,Coleomegilla maculata De Geer, Cotesiamarginiventris (Cresson), Geocoris punctipes (Say), andHippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, intopical, residual, and field assays. Lambda cyhalothrin exhibited thegreatest toxicity to the natural enemies. In topical toxicity tests,lambda cyhalothrin adversely affected each natural enemy speciesstudied. Residues of lambda cyhalothrin on cotton leaves were toxic toB. mellitor, C. nigriceps, C.maculata, and G. punctipes. Interestingly, residues ofthis insecticide were not very toxic to C. marginiventrisand H. convergens. Geocoris punctipes and C.maculata numbers in the field generally were significantly lowerfor lambda cyhalothrin treatments than for the other four treatments,substantiating the previous tests. Although cotton aphids began toincrease over all treatments around the middle of the test period, thenumber of cotton aphids in the lambda cyhalothrin plots wassignificantly higher than the number in any of the other treatments. Ascotton aphids increased in lambda cyhalothrin field plots, the predatorH. convergens also increased in number, indicating thatlambda cyhalothrin did not adversely affect it in accordance with theresidual tests. Spinosad exhibited marginal to excellent selectivity,but was highly toxic to each parasitoid species and G.punctipes in topical toxicity tests and to B. mellitorin residual tests. Spinosad generally did not affect the number ofG. punctipes, H. convergens, and C. maculata inthe field except for one day after the second application for G.punctipes. S-1812 exhibited good to excellent selectivity to thenatural enemies. Some reduction of G. punctipes occurred foronly a short period after the first and second application of thisinsecticide in the field. H. convergens and C.maculata were affected very little by S-1812.

[1]  P. Elzen,et al.  Lethal and sublethal effects of selected insecticides on Geocoris punctipes , 1999 .

[2]  S. Dreistadt,et al.  Natural Enemies Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Biological Pest Control , 1998 .

[3]  E. King,et al.  Laboratory toxicity of insecticide residues to Orius insidiosus, Geocoris punctipes, Hippodamia convergens, and Chrysoperla carnea , 1998 .

[4]  W. P. Scott,et al.  Susceptibility of Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Field Rates of Selected Cotton Insecticides2 , 1997 .

[5]  J. R. Coppedge,et al.  KISS-a new portable pneumatic 'keep it simple sampler' for row crop insects , 1997 .

[6]  D. Murray,et al.  The effect of Spinosad (tracer) on arthropod pest and beneficial populations in Australian cotton , 1997 .

[7]  P. G. Tillman Susceptibility of Microplitis croceipes and Cardiochiles nigriceps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Field Rates of Selected Cotton Insecticides1 , 1995 .

[8]  W. J. Lewis,et al.  Management of the Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Cotton: Role of Natural Enemies , 1994 .

[9]  Brian A. Croft,et al.  Arthropod biological control agents and pesticides , 1990 .

[10]  W. H. Cross,et al.  Biology, Control, and Eradication of the Boll Weevil , 1973 .

[11]  W. Lewis,et al.  Efficiency of Cardiochiles nigriceps as a Parasite of Heliothis virescens on Cotton , 1972 .

[12]  R. Ridgway,et al.  Consumption by Several Common Arthropod Predators of Eggs and Larvae of Two Heliothis Species That Attack Cotton , 1968 .