A Randomized Trial of Biofilm Dressing for Venous Leg Ulcers

Objective: Comparison of Biofilm dressing with Jelonet and Betadine in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Design: Randomized parallel-group controlled trial, stratified by initial maximum ulcer diameter of 2–4 cm or >4 cm. Setting: Community. Patients: Five hundred and twenty-nine patients were assessed and 200 patients with clinical evidence of venous leg ulceration and initial ulcer diameter >2 cm were recruited to the trial. Patients with appreciable arterial disease (ratio of ankle to brachial systolic pressure <0.75) were excluded. Interventions: Ulcers were treated with either Biofilm (a hydrocolloid dressing) or Betadine and Jelonet in the community for 4 months or until the ulcer healed, if sooner. All patients wore standardized graduated compression. Main outcome measures: Time to complete healing of the ulcer, subjective assessment of pain and total cost of treatment. Results: Healing was more rapid in patients using Biofilm dressing (relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.8–1.8), but not significantly so p = 0.48. Patients' subjective pain scores after 1 month of treatment indicated there was significantly less pain experienced by patients treated with Biofilm (p = 0.02). The total cost of treatment (including dressings and nursing time) was similar for Biofilm and Betadine for small ulcers (<6 cm) but Biofilm cost three times as much for larger ulcers. Conclusion: Provided that standardized graduated compression was used, the primary dressing did not significantly affect the time to complete healing of the ulcer.

[1]  A. Charlett,et al.  Venous leg ulcers: a prognostic index to predict time to healing. , 1992, BMJ.

[2]  A D Chant,et al.  Sustained compression and healing of chronic venous ulcers. , 1989, BMJ.

[3]  Wilfrid Joseph Dixon,et al.  Bmdp Statistical Software Manual: To Accompany the 1988 Software Release , 1988 .

[4]  M. J. Kikta,et al.  A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boots versus hydroactive dressing in the treatment of venous statis ulcers , 1988 .

[5]  C. Doré,et al.  Graduated compression and its relation to venous refilling time , 1988, British medical journal.

[6]  E. Christensen Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model , 1987, Hepatology.

[7]  D. Leaper,et al.  Treatment of Chronic Leg Ulcers in the Community: A Comparative Trial of Scherisorb and Iodosorb , 1987 .

[8]  C. Doré,et al.  Leg ulcers: Epidemiology and aetiology , 1986, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  M. Tempest An environment for healing: The role of occlusion , 1986 .

[10]  J. A. Fox,et al.  Controlled trial of Iodosorb in chronic venous ulcers. , 1985, British medical journal.

[11]  A. Kuk All subsets regression in a proportional hazards model , 1984 .

[12]  W. Su,et al.  Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing. , 1984, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  J. Cameron Dressing leg ulcers. , 1991, Nursing the elderly : in hospital, homes and the community.

[14]  P. Roelens Double-blind placebo-controlled study with topical 2% ketanserin ointment in the treatment of venous ulcers. , 1989, Dermatologica.

[15]  M. J. Kikta,et al.  A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boots versus hydroactive dressing in the treatment of venous stasis ulcers. , 1988, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  Kakkar Vv A physiological study of elastic compression stockings in venous disorders of the leg. , 1982 .