Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use

Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features – nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers – analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.

[1]  Douglas Biber,et al.  University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers , 2006 .

[2]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[3]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Emerging variation: determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English , 2007, English Language and Linguistics.

[4]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[5]  Merja Kytö,et al.  English in transition : corpus-based studies in linguistic variation and genre styles , 1997 .

[6]  M. Krug Emerging English modals : a corpus-based study of grammaticalization , 2000 .

[7]  Lars Hinrichs,et al.  Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written English: a multivariate comparison across time, space, and genres , 2008 .

[8]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures , 2002 .

[9]  Charles F. Meyer Apposition in contemporary English: List of figures , 1992 .

[10]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[11]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power , 1993 .

[12]  P. Pahta,et al.  Re-phrasing in Early English: The use of expository apposition with an explicit marker from 1350 to 1710 , 2011 .

[13]  David Banks,et al.  The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context , 2008 .

[14]  Christian Mair,et al.  Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization , 2006 .

[15]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[16]  Helena Raumolin-Brunberg The noun phrase in early sixteenth-century English : a study based on Sir Thomas More's writings , 1991 .

[17]  Douglas Biber The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy: Are There Linguistic Consequences of Literacy? Comparing the Potentials of Language Use in Speech and Writing , 2009 .

[18]  飯島 周 「会話の文法」に関する一考察 : Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written Englishの場合 , 1999 .

[19]  Jacek Fisiak,et al.  Studies in Middle English linguistics , 1997 .

[20]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study , 2009 .

[21]  Christian Mair,et al.  Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English , 2004 .

[22]  The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present , 2008 .

[23]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Motives for Language Change: From subjectification to intersubjectification , 2003 .

[24]  Have to, gotta, must?: Grammaticalisation, variation and specialization in English deontic modality , 2004 .

[25]  N. H. J. Oostdijk,et al.  Apposition in contemporary English , 1994 .

[26]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach , 2002 .

[27]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness , 2010 .

[28]  Barbara A. Fox,et al.  Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration , 2007 .

[29]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[30]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[31]  H. Hughes The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[32]  Laurie Jane Anderson,et al.  Differences between spoken and written language , 1990 .