Evaluation of interfacial mechanical properties of fiber reinforced composites using the microindentation method

Abstract A general parametric study using nonlinear finite element analysis for the microindentation test for composite interfacial shear strength measurement was performed. The effects of material parameters such as matrix and interphase properties and interphase thickness on the interfacial shear stress distribution and load—displacement data were evaluated. The finite element results were compared to those of the shear lag analyses and an empirical derivation. It was found that the empirical derivation agrees reasonably well with the nonlinear finite element analysis when the fiber volume fraction is between 0.3 and 0.5. The shear lag analysis is accurate only when the fiber volume fraction is low. The interfacial shear stress is sensitive to local fiber volume fraction and interphase properties. Accurate interfacial shear strength can be obtained if a more stringent test procedure is adopted.

[1]  J. Favre,et al.  Testing of SiC/titanium composites by fragmentation and push-out tests: comparison and discussion of test data , 1994 .

[2]  L. C. Hollaway,et al.  Load bearing composites , 1987 .

[3]  L. Drzal,et al.  Non-linear numerical study of the single-fiber fragmentation test. Part I: Test mechanics , 1995 .

[4]  Lawrence T. Drzal,et al.  Comparison of methods for the measurement of fibre/matrix adhesion in composites , 1992 .

[5]  L. Drzal,et al.  Non-linear numerical study of the single-fiber fragmentation test. Part II: A parametric study , 1995 .

[6]  L. Drzal,et al.  Adhesion of Graphite Fibers to Epoxy Matrices: I. The Role of Fiber Surface Treatment , 1983 .

[7]  L. Greszczuk Theoretical Studies of the Mechanics of the Fiber-Matrix Interface in Composites , 1969 .

[8]  T. Peijs,et al.  Interfacial phenomena in composite materials , 1996 .

[9]  L. Drzal,et al.  Silicon oxycarbide coatings on graphite fibers II. Adhesion, processing, and interfacial properties , 1995 .

[10]  A. Kelly,et al.  Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: Copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum , 1965 .

[11]  R. Keunings,et al.  Modelling of critical fibre length and interfacial debonding in the fragmentation testing of polymer composites , 1992 .

[12]  L. Drzal,et al.  Adhesion to carbon fiber surfaces: Surface chemical and energetic effects , 1994 .

[13]  John A. Nairn,et al.  A variational mechanics analysis of the stresses around breaks in embedded fibers , 1992 .

[14]  H. Wagner,et al.  Effect of water on the mechanical adhesion of the glass/epoxy interface , 1994 .

[15]  H. Tsai,et al.  Prediction of fiber-matrix interphase properties and their influence on interface stress, displacement and fracture toughness of composite material , 1990 .

[16]  L. Penn,et al.  Improved analysis and experimental evaluation of the single filament pull-out test , 1992 .

[17]  Y. Mai,et al.  Stress transfer in the fibre fragmentation test , 1993, Journal of Materials Science.

[18]  D. F. Adams,et al.  Further development of the losipescu shear test method , 1987 .

[19]  G. L. Farley,et al.  Composite material shear property measurement using the Iosipescu specimen , 1992 .