One-year safety and efficacy results of a hydrogel inlay to improve near vision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia.

PURPOSE To conduct a feasibility study of the safety and efficacy of a corneal contouring inlay as a treatment for emmetropic presbyopia. METHODS The Raindrop corneal inlay (ReVision Optics, Inc., Lake Forest, CA) was implanted on the corneal stromal bed beneath a keratotomy flap in 20 nondominant eyes of 20 patients. The implant is designed to cause a change in the curvature of the overlying cornea, with a subsequent multifocal change in refractive power. Efficacy outcome was defined as at least 75% of eyes with uncorrected near visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR (20/40 Snellen) or better at 6 months. Main safety outcomes were retention of preoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity and reports of adverse events. Other outcome measures included contrast sensitivity; near, intermediate, and distance visual acuities; patient satisfaction; spectacle use; and complications. RESULTS All implanted eyes achieved uncorrected near visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR (20/40 Snellen) or better by the 1-week postoperative examination and remained so throughout the 1-year follow-up period, also averaging less than 0.1 logMAR (20/25 Snellen) monocularly and binocularly throughout that period. Mean binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity remained within 0.02 logMAR of the preoperative mean throughout the study. One patient who was dissatisfied with the resulting vision underwent explantation. At 1 year, 16 of 19 patients seldom or never wore glasses and all 19 were satisfied or very satisfied with their overall vision. CONCLUSIONS The hydrogel corneal inlay improved uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuity in patients with emmetropic presbyopia, with high patient satisfaction and little effect on distance visual acuity.

[1]  Renée Solomon,et al.  The effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[2]  D. Choyce The correction of refractive errors with polysulfone corneal inlays. A new frontier to be explored? , 1985, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[3]  Werner Adler,et al.  Measuring contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC® 6500: influence of age and glare , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  B. McCarey,et al.  Eight years experience with Permalens intracorneal lenses in nonhuman primates. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[5]  R. Beuerman,et al.  Assessment of the long‐term corneal response to hydrogel intrastromal lenses implanted in monkey eyes for up to five years , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  M. Refojo,et al.  Synthetic polymers in corneal surgery. I. Glyceryl methacrylate. , 1967, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Lam,et al.  Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Barraquer,et al.  Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. , 1966, International ophthalmology clinics.

[9]  D. M. Andrews,et al.  Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  D. Evans,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the CSV-1000 contrast test and its relationship to glaucoma therapy. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  U. Mester,et al.  Measurement and Calculation of Refraction in Experimental Keratophakia with Hydrophilic Lenses , 1976 .

[12]  D. Durrie The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). , 2006, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[13]  W. Knowles Effect of intralamellar plastic membranes on corneal physiology. , 1961, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  R. Steinert,et al.  Hydrogel intracorneal lenses in aphakic eyes. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.