A Noisy Paracrine Signal Determines the Cellular NF-κB Response to Lipopolysaccharide

A low-concentration paracrine TNF-α signal contributes to the variability in NF-κB activation dynamics in the response to lipopolysaccharide. Prolonging NF-κB Activation Regulation of the activity of the transcription factor NF-κB, which plays key roles in immune responses, exhibits complicated cellular dynamics. Tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF-α), a proinflammatory cytokine that activates the death-domain receptor TNFR, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a pathogen-derived molecule that activates the Toll-like receptor TLR4, both activate NF-κB. Lee et al. provide a mechanism by which cells respond to these two ligands with different kinetics. Cells responding to TNF-α exhibit an oscillating translocation of NF-κB in and out of the nucleus, with all cells responding similarly. In contrast, cells responding to LPS showed two distinct modes, with one population exhibiting transient nuclear localization of NF-κB and a second exhibiting persistent nuclear localization. Lee et al. modified an existing computational model of the pathways that activate NF-κB and found that cells responding to LPS produce TNF-α in concentrations that are low enough that only a subset of neighboring cells responds. This paracrine TNF-α signal produces the population of LPS-responsive cells with persistent prolonged NF-κB activation. Nearly identical cells can exhibit substantially different responses to the same stimulus. We monitored the nuclear localization dynamics of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) in single cells stimulated with tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF-α) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cells stimulated with TNF-α have quantitative differences in NF-κB nuclear localization, whereas LPS-stimulated cells can be clustered into transient or persistent responders, representing two qualitatively different groups based on the NF-κB response. These distinct behaviors can be linked to a secondary paracrine signal secreted at low concentrations, such that not all cells undergo a second round of NF-κB activation. From our single-cell data, we built a computational model that captures cell variability, as well as population behaviors. Our findings show that mammalian cells can create “noisy” environments to produce diversified responses to stimuli.

[1]  The Physiology of Cells , 1968 .

[2]  G P Nolan,et al.  The p65 subunit of NF-kappa B regulates I kappa B by two distinct mechanisms. , 1993, Genes & development.

[3]  W C Greene,et al.  NF-kappa B controls expression of inhibitor I kappa B alpha: evidence for an inducible autoregulatory pathway. , 1993, Science.

[4]  M J May,et al.  NF-kappa B and Rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[5]  H. Pahl Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-κB transcription factors , 1999, Oncogene.

[6]  H. Pahl,et al.  Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors. , 1999, Oncogene.

[7]  D. S. Broomhead,et al.  Synergistic control of oscillations in the NFk B signalling pathway , 2000 .

[8]  S. Akira,et al.  Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[9]  M. Albert Faculty Opinions recommendation of The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002 .

[10]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[11]  David Baltimore,et al.  Germline Transmission and Tissue-Specific Expression of Transgenes Delivered by Lentiviral Vectors , 2002, Science.

[12]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002, Science.

[13]  David G Spiller,et al.  Multi-parameter analysis of the kinetics of NF-kappaB signalling and transcription in single living cells. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[14]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[15]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Investigations Into the Analysis and Modeling of the TNFα-Mediated NF-κB-Signaling Pathway , 2003 .

[16]  Shizuo Akira,et al.  Toll/IL-1 Receptor Domain-Containing Adaptor Inducing IFN-β (TRIF) Associates with TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 and TANK-Binding Kinase 1, and Activates Two Distinct Transcription Factors, NF-κB and IFN-Regulatory Factor-3, in the Toll-Like Receptor Signaling 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[17]  M. Nishijima,et al.  Identification of Mouse MD-2 Residues Important for Forming the Cell Surface TLR4-MD-2 Complex Recognized by Anti-TLR4-MD-2 Antibodies, and for Conferring LPS and Taxol Responsiveness on Mouse TLR4 by Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Investigations into the analysis and modeling of the TNF alpha-mediated NF-kappa B-signaling pathway. , 2003, Genome research.

[19]  Ruslan Medzhitov,et al.  Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Pathways , 2003, Science.

[20]  Stanislav Y Shvartsman,et al.  Stochastic model of autocrine and paracrine signals in cell culture assays. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[21]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of parameters controlling oscillatory signalling in the NF-kappaB pathway: the roles of IKK and IkappaBalpha. , 2004, Systems biology.

[22]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Mathematical model of NF-kappaB regulatory module. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch , 2004, Science.

[24]  Giulio Superti-Furga,et al.  A physical and functional map of the human TNF-α/NF-κB signal transduction pathway , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  G. Casari,et al.  A physical and functional map of the human TNF-alpha/NF-kappa B signal transduction pathway. , 2004, Nature cell biology.

[26]  R. Perona,et al.  Control of oncogenesis and cancer therapy resistance , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  D B Kell,et al.  Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. , 2004, Science.

[28]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Mathematical model of NF- κB regulatory module , 2004 .

[29]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of parameters controlling oscillatory signalling in the NFk B pathway : the roles of IKK and I k B a , 2004 .

[30]  James R. Johnson,et al.  Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[31]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  Response to Comment on "Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression" , 2005, Science.

[32]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis , 2005, Bioinform..

[33]  Allan R Brasier,et al.  A TNF-induced gene expression program under oscillatory NF-κB control , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[34]  David Baltimore,et al.  Achieving stability of lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-kappaB activation. , 2005, Science.

[35]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[36]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Physiological functions for brain NF-κB , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Transient IKK activity mediates NF-κB temporal dynamics in response to a wide range of TNFα doses , 2005 .

[38]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Physiological functions for brain NF-kappaB. , 2005, Trends in neurosciences.

[39]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Comment on "Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression" , 2005, Science.

[40]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Achieving Stability of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced NF-κB Activation , 2005, Science.

[41]  D S Broomhead,et al.  Synergistic control of oscillations in the NF-kappaB signalling pathway. , 2005, Systems biology.

[42]  Alexander Hoffmann,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Gene Expression Programs Determined by Temporal Control of IKK Activity , 2005, Science.

[43]  Richard G. Jenner,et al.  Coordinated binding of NF-kappaB family members in the response of human cells to lipopolysaccharide. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Norman W. Paton,et al.  Automated tracking of gene expression in individual cells and cell compartments , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[45]  Esteban O. Mazzoni,et al.  Stochastic spineless expression creates the retinal mosaic for colour vision , 2006, Nature.

[46]  A. Arkin,et al.  From Fluctuations to Phenotypes: The Physiology of Noise , 2006, Science's STKE.

[47]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Transient IκB Kinase Activity Mediates Temporal NF-κB Dynamics in Response to a Wide Range of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Doses* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Julian R. E. Davis,et al.  Tumor necrosis factor-alpha activates the human prolactin gene promoter via nuclear factor-kappaB signaling. , 2006, Endocrinology.

[49]  Allan R. Brasier,et al.  Identification of an NF-κB-Dependent Gene Network in Cells Infected by Mammalian Reovirus , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[50]  C Jayaprakash,et al.  NF-kappaB oscillations and cell-to-cell variability. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[51]  山本 雅裕 Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent Toll-like receptor signaling pathway , 2006 .

[52]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Transient IkappaB kinase activity mediates temporal NF-kappaB dynamics in response to a wide range of tumor necrosis factor-alpha doses. , 2006, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[53]  Julian R. E. Davis,et al.  Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Activates the Human Prolactin Gene Promoter via Nuclear Factor-κB Signaling , 2006 .

[54]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[55]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Deterministic and Stochastic Models of NFκB Pathway , 2007, Cardiovascular Toxicology.

[56]  Shizuo Akira,et al.  Signaling to NF-?B by Toll-like receptors , 2007 .

[57]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression Determines Cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Science.

[58]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[59]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.

[60]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  A homeostatic model of IκB metabolism to control constitutive NF-κB activity , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[61]  Eran Segal,et al.  Motif module map reveals enforcement of aging by continual NF-κB activity , 2007 .

[62]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Single TNFα trimers mediating NF-κB activation: stochastic robustness of NF-κB signaling , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[63]  Joshy George,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of RELA(p65) binding identifies E2F1 as a transcriptional activator recruited by NF-kappaB upon TLR4 activation. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[64]  Shizuo Akira,et al.  Signaling to NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptors. , 2007, Trends in molecular medicine.

[65]  G. Natoli,et al.  The Histone H3 Lysine-27 Demethylase Jmjd3 Links Inflammation to Inhibition of Polycomb-Mediated Gene Silencing , 2007, Cell.

[66]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Deterministic and stochastic models of NFkappaB pathway. , 2007, Cardiovascular toxicology.

[67]  J. Faulon,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of a Computational Model of the IKK–NF‐κB–IκBα–A20 Signal Transduction Network , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[68]  S. Akira,et al.  Signaling to NF-kB by Toll-like receptors , 2007 .

[69]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Stochasticity and Cell Fate , 2008, Science.

[70]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[71]  M. Pasparakis,et al.  GFP‐p65 knock‐in mice as a tool to study NF‐κB dynamics in vivo , 2009, Genesis.

[72]  D. S. Broomhead,et al.  Pulsatile Stimulation Determines Timing and Specificity of NF-κB-Dependent Transcription , 2009, Science.