Foresight on environmental technologies: options for the prioritisation of future research funding – lessons learned from the project “Roadmap Environmental Technologies 2020+”

There is broad consensus that tackling the increasing global environmental problems will require the support of technology. Consequently, environmental technologies are regarded as one of the fastest growing global markets. Owing to the wide range of technologies available that can contribute to progress in this field, there is a high demand for prospective research setting priorities in a transparent way. Against this background, the presented study aimed at supporting the process of identifying and recommending options for the prioritisation of future research funding. Taking Germany as an example, this was done by analysing chances and perspectives of different environmental technologies as well as courses of action in combination with the aim of reaching new markets for seven environmental fields of action: Climate protection, air pollution control, water management, soil conservation, protection of scarce resources, waste management and biodiversity. As a key-element of the study, future environmental challenges and promising future technological developments were identified by an extensive literature review and internet research, followed by a large-scale expert survey and several topic-specific workshops. Results demonstrate that one focus of future funding should be put on technology development for meeting the demands of emerging and developing countries. Thus, an appropriate response for the German environmental industry to such global challenges requires the provision of exportable environmental technologies, although this will change the requirement profiles of the technologies. Many high-tech-products, developed for the European market, are not directly applicable or invaluable for emerging and developing countries. The study also recommends that funding should not concentrate on individual technologies, but rather on holistic views of technologies, processes, material and energy flows. Furthermore, the estimations of market potential for the investigated technologies are closely connected to the ecological problems and their social perception in different countries. Basis strategies should be developed, which take into account the technical development as well as the main drivers and constrains.

[1]  Kristian Borch,et al.  Emerging technologies in favour of sustainable agriculture , 2007 .

[2]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Using Regulation to Change the Market for Innovation , 1985 .

[3]  J. Bakkes,et al.  Recent Developments and Trends , 2009 .

[4]  A. Jordan,et al.  Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review , 2010 .

[5]  Roberto Sanchez-Rodriguez,et al.  Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability to global environmental change: challenges and pathways for an action-oriented research agenda for middle-income and low-income countries , 2010 .

[6]  Klaus Jacob,et al.  Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations: A New Role for the Nation State , 2004, Global Environmental Politics.

[7]  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber,et al.  World in transition: a social contract for sustainability , 2011 .

[8]  Claudia Kemfert,et al.  The role of technological change for a sustainable development , 2005 .

[9]  Richard Perkins,et al.  Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: A critical assessment and reconstruction , 2003 .

[10]  Christer Sjöström,et al.  State-of-the-art report , 1997 .

[11]  Tomoo Machiba.  Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices , 2010 .

[12]  Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen.  World in transition : Strategies for managing global environmental risks : annual report 1998 , 2000 .

[13]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[14]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[15]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Making nanotechnology developments sustainable. A role for technology assessment , 2008 .

[16]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Government and Environmental Innovation in Europe and North America , 2002 .

[17]  Martin Jänicke,et al.  Ecological modernisation: new perspectives , 2008 .

[18]  Ian Miles,et al.  The Handbook of Technology Foresight - Concepts and Practice , 2008 .

[19]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  Effective identification and management of emerging food risks: results of an international Delphi survey. , 2010 .

[20]  R. Pachauri.  Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report , 2008 .

[21]  S. Forge.  The Handbook of Technology Foresight , 2009 .

[22]  D. Cyranoski.  Climate change: The long-range forecast , 2005, Nature.

[23]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Towards sustainable households: a methodology for developing sustainable technological and social innovations , 2002 .

[24]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Fast-Growing Countries: The Benefits of Early Action , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  T. Foxon,et al.  Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime , 2008 .

[26]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  Public policy and clean technology promotion. The synergy between environmental economics and evolutionary economics of technological change , 2004 .