Self/non‐self discrimination in roots

Summary 1 Competition usually involves the allocation of limiting resources to non-reproductive functions. Natural selection is expected to favour mechanisms that increase competition with non-self neighbours and limit wasteful competition with self. 2 We used Pisum sativum plants that had two roots and ‘double plants’ with two shoots and two roots that could be either longitudinally separated into two genetically identical but physiologically distinct individuals or left intact. 3 Root development was significantly greater in split-root plants whose neighbours belonged to different plants. Furthermore, root development was relatively greater in the presence of roots of a different plant, regardless of its identity. This discrimination had a vectorial component whereby plants developed more and longer lateral roots towards neighbouring roots of different plants than towards other roots of the same plant. 4 The results thus demonstrate a mechanism of avoiding self-competition that is based on physiological co-ordination among different organs of the same plant rather than on allochemical recognition that depends on genetic differences. 5 The ability to discriminate between self and non-self could be expected to increase resource use efficiency and ecological performance in plants. It could also be expected that tight physiological co-ordination will be selected for between organs of the same plant that have greater probability of being engaged in direct competitive interactions with each other.

[1]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  A Test of the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis Using Transgenic and Mutant Plants Disabled in Phytochrome-Mediated Elongation Responses to Neighbors , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[2]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[3]  Machiko Kimura,et al.  Allometry and life history of a forest understory palm Pinanga coronata (Arecaceae) on Mount Halimun, West Java , 2002, Ecological Research.

[4]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems , 1992 .

[5]  P. Tomlinson,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis , 1978 .

[6]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Root growth responses of three Great Basin perennials to intra and interspecific contact with other roots , 1995 .

[7]  H. Kroon,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants , 1997 .

[8]  M. Tokeshi,et al.  Species Coexistence: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives , 1998 .

[9]  R. Grosberg,et al.  Aggression, Habituation, and Clonal Coexistence in the Sea Anemone Anthopleura elegantissima , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[10]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Manipulative Approaches to Testing Adaptive Plasticity: Phytochrome‐Mediated Shade‐Avoidance Responses in Plants , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[11]  K. Sebens.  AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN THE INTERTIDAL SEA ANEMONE ANTHOPLEURA XANTHOGRAMMICA , 1984 .

[12]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties , 2002 .

[13]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[14]  H. Honda,et al.  Tree Branch Angle: Maximizing Effective Leaf Area , 1978, Science.

[15]  R. Grosberg.  The Evolution of Allorecognition Specificity in Clonal Invertebrates , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[16]  D. R. Hoagland,et al.  The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil , 2018 .

[17]  R. Snow.  ON THE UPWARD INHIBITING EFFECT OF AUXIN IN SHOOTS , 1938 .

[18]  R. Grosberg,et al.  KIN INTERACTIONS IN A COLONIAL HYDROZOAN (HYDRACTINIA SYMBIOLONGICARPUS): POPULATION STRUCTURE ON A MOBILE LANDSCAPE , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  B. Rinkevich,et al.  Allorecognition responses in the soft coral Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum from the Red Sea. , 1996 .

[20]  J. Nasrallah,et al.  Recognizing self in the self-incompatibility response. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[21]  Prof. Dr. Francis Hallé,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests , 1978, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  Dan Cohen,et al.  Ecological implications of correlative inhibition between plant shoots , 1989 .

[23]  G. Moretti,et al.  [Mycetes and bacteria]. , 1967, Minerva dermatologica.

[24]  A. Richman.  Evolution of balanced genetic polymorphism , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[25]  M. Gersani,et al.  Development correlations between roots in heterogeneous environments , 1992 .

[26]  Harry Smith.  Physiological and Ecological Function within the Phytochrome Family , 1995 .

[27]  P. Tomlinson,et al.  Adaptive architecture in rhizomatous plants , 1980 .

[28]  Yasunori Saito,et al.  Colony Specificity in the Marine Bryozoan Dakaria subovoidea , 1995 .

[29]  P. Alpert,et al.  Root cooperation in a clonal plant: connected strawberries segregate roots , 2002, Oecologia.

[30]  W. D. Jeschke,et al.  External Potassium Supply is not Required for Root Growth in Saline Conditions: Experiments with Ricinus communis L. Grown in a Reciprocal Split-Root System , 1988 .

[31]  Dan Cohen,et al.  INCREASING PLANT PRODUCTIVITY BY CHANGING THE SOLAR SPECTRUM , 1990 .

[32]  K. Toko,et al.  Relationship between Growth and Electric Oscillations in Bean Roots. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[33]  R. Grosberg,et al.  Mate selection and the evolution of highly polymorphic self/nonself recognition genes. , 2000, Science.

[34]  Cynthia Weinig,et al.  PLASTICITY VERSUS CANALIZATION: POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN THE TIMING OF SHADE-AVOIDANCE RESPONSES , 2000 .

[35]  R. Kuchenbuch,et al.  Image analysis for non-destructive and non-invasive quantification of root growth and soil water content in rhizotrons , 2002 .

[36]  C. Barnard.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edition, J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1984), xi , 1985 .

[37]  H. J. Schenk,et al.  Spatial Root Segregation: Are Plants Territorial? , 1999 .

[38]  C. Wardlaw.  Plant Morphogenesis , 1961, Nature.

[39]  B. Goodwin,et al.  A phase-shift model for the spatial and temporal organization of developing systems. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Why does a branch suffer more after branch-wide than after tree-wide defoliation ? , 1994 .

[41]  T. Sachs.  Pattern Formation in Plant Tissues , 1991 .

[42]  M. Weisenseel,et al.  Growth, Gravitropism, and Endogenous Ion Currents of Cress Roots (Lepidium sativum L.) : Measurements Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Recording Probe. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[43]  Leo W. Buss,et al.  Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms , 1988 .

[44]  H. Kroon,et al.  CLONAL GROWTH IN PLANTS: REGULATION AND FUNCTION , 1990 .

[45]  S. Oparil,et al.  Sex hormones and hypertension. , 2002, Cardiovascular research.

[46]  D. Whitehead,et al.  Response of transpiration and photosynthesis to a transient change in illuminated foliage area for a Pinus radiata D. Don tree , 1996 .

[47]  M. Mangel.  Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (4th edn) , 1997 .

[48]  A. Lugo,et al.  Ecological consequences of root grafting in tabonuco (Dacryodes excelsa) trees in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico , 1993 .

[49]  G. Mendel,et al.  Versuche Uber Pflanzenhybriden , 1960 .

[50]  J. Coleman,et al.  BIOMASS ALLOCATION IN PLANTS: ONTOGENY OR OPTIMALITY? A TEST ALONG THREE RESOURCE GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[51]  R. Grosberg,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF ALLORECOGNITION IN THE COLONIAL HYDROID HYDRACTINIA SYMBIOLONGICARPUS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition , 2001 .

[53]  P. Alpert,et al.  Differences in performance between genotypes of Fragaria chiloensis with different degrees of resource sharing , 2003 .

[54]  A. Nardini,et al.  Competitive strategies for water availability in two Mediterranean Quercus species , 1999 .

[55]  R. Callaway,et al.  Effects of Regional Origin and Genotype on Intraspecific Root Communication in the Desert Shrub Ambrosia Dumosa (Asteraceae) , 1996 .

[56]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[57]  R. W. Snow.  Experiments on Growth and Inhibition. Part II.--New Phenomena of Inhibition , 1931 .

[58]  R. Grosberg,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELECTIVE AGGRESSION CONDITIONED ON ALLORECOGNITION SPECIFICITY , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[60]  A. Novoplansky.  Hierarchy establishment among potentially similar buds , 1996 .

[61]  G. Mendel.  Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden , 1941, Der Zauchter Zeitschrift fur Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik.

[62]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[63]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root communication among desert shrubs. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.