Haptic Shape Constancy Across Distance

To explore haptic shape constancy across distance, we measured perceived curvature thresholds of cylindrical shapes, cut out of acetal resin blocks. On each trial, blindfolded observers used their bare finger to scan the surface of two shapes consecutively. One shape was close to the observer and the other positioned further away. This spatial displacement changes the available proprioceptive information about the object shape, and therefore the combined proprio-tactile information may signal different objects at the two distances. The results reveal a perceptual compensation for the change in proprioceptive information. However, two distinct patterns of distance compensation emerged: the data from one group are consistent with predictions from visual object constancy. The other group of observers demonstrate the reverse pattern of response such that objects further away need to have lower curvature to be perceived having equal curvature. We suggest that perceived haptic curvature across distance depends on observers’ differential weighting of the multiple available cues.

[1]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Weak spatial constancy in touch , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[2]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Haptic Shape Cues, Invariants, Priors, and Interface Design , 2008 .

[3]  M. Wexler,et al.  Anticipating the three-dimensional consequences of eye movements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Is there a ‘plenhaptic’ function? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  D. Knill.  Learning Bayesian priors for depth perception. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[6]  S. Howard Bartley.  The perception of size or distance based on tactile and kinesthetic data. , 1953 .

[7]  M. Grunwald.  Human haptic perception : basics and applications , 2008 .

[8]  W. Epstein.  Stability and constancy in visual perception : mechanisms and processes , 1977 .

[9]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Trajectory of contact region on the fingerpad gives the illusion of haptic shape , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  P. Haggard,et al.  Keeping the world a constant size: object constancy in human touch , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Gepshtein,et al.  Viewing Geometry Determines How Vision and Haptics Combine in Size Perception , 2003, Current Biology.

[12]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Visual and Haptic Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Large Scale Differences between Haptic and Visual Judgments of Curvature , 1997, Perception.

[15]  A. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Humans Ignore Motion and Stereo Cues in Favor of a Fictional Stable World , 2006, Current Biology.

[16]  B. Foss,et al.  The Tactile Perception of Size: Some Relationships with Distance and Direction , 1963 .

[17]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[18]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.