Water Quality Model Uncertainty Analysis of a Point‐Point Source Phosphorus Trading Program 1

Kardos, Josef S. and Christopher C. Obropta, 2011. Water Quality Model Uncertainty Analysis of a Point-Point Source Phosphorus Trading Program. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 47(6):1317–1337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00591.x Abstract:  Water quality modeling is a major source of scientific uncertainty in the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) process. The effects of these uncertainties extend to water quality trading programs designed to implement TMDLs. This study examines the effects of water quality model uncertainty on a nutrient trading program. The study builds on previous work to design a phosphorus trading program for the Nontidal Passaic River Basin in New Jersey that would implement the watershed TMDL for total phosphorus (TP). The study identified how water quality model uncertainty affects outcomes of potential trades of TP between wastewater treatment plants. The uncertainty analysis found no evidence to suggest that the outcome of trades between wastewater treatment plants, as compared with command and control regulation, will significantly increase uncertainty in the attainment of dissolved oxygen surface water quality standards, site-specific chlorophyll a criteria, and reduction targets for diverted TP load at potential hot spots in the watershed. Each simulated trading scenario demonstrated parity with or improvement from the command and control approach at the TMDL critical locations, and low risk of hot spots elsewhere.

[1]  Gemma Manache,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of a Water-Quality Model using Latin Hypercube Sampling , 2004 .

[2]  J. C. Helton,et al.  A COMPARISON OF UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR COMPUTER MODELS , 1985 .

[3]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making , 1994 .

[4]  Charles S. Melching,et al.  Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of passaic river , 1996 .

[5]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices , 2007 .

[6]  Josef S. Kardos,et al.  Application of an Environmental Decision Support System to a Water Quality Trading Program Affected by Surface Water Diversions , 2008, Environmental management.

[7]  Tze Ling Ng,et al.  Effects of discharge permit trading on water quality reliability , 2005 .

[8]  Josef S. Kardos,et al.  Effect of Water Quality Model Uncertainty on the Passaic TMDL and Water Quality Trading Program for Total Phosphorus , 2008 .

[9]  Manoj K. Jha,et al.  The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction Across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients As an Implementation Tool , 2006 .

[10]  H. E. Jobson.  Users manual for an open-channel streamflow model based on the diffusion analogy , 1989 .

[11]  G. van Straten,et al.  Uncertainty in the Parameters and Predictions of Phytoplankton Models , 1979 .

[12]  Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt,et al.  The effect of complexity on parameter sensitivity and model uncertainty in river water quality modelling , 2006 .

[13]  U. Aswathanarayana,et al.  Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management , 2001 .

[14]  D. King.  Crunch Time for Water Quality Trading , 2005 .

[15]  Subhabrata Chakraborti,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[16]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Approaches to Evaluate Water Quality Model Parameter Uncertainty for Adaptive TMDL Implementation1 , 2007 .

[17]  James J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) , 1900 .

[18]  G. D. Wyss,et al.  A user`s guide to LHS: Sandia`s Latin Hypercube Sampling Software , 1998 .

[19]  Steven C. Chapra,et al.  Engineering Water Quality Models and TMDLs , 2003 .

[20]  R. Iman,et al.  A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables , 1982 .

[21]  C. Stow,et al.  Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: a probabilistic approach for TMDL development. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN COUPLED NONPOINT SOURCE AND STREAM WATER-QUALITY MODELS , 2001 .

[23]  P. Faeth.  Fertile Ground : Nutrient Trading's Potential to Cost-Effectively improve Water Quality , 2000 .

[24]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[25]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[26]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN TMDL MODELS , 2006 .